buley commited on
Commit
df1e00b
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 2cee655

Upload behavioral taxonomy dataset

Browse files
README.md CHANGED
@@ -14,7 +14,10 @@ tags:
14
  - taxonomy
15
  - affectively
16
  - edgework
17
- pretty_name: "Behavioral Taxonomy: Emotions, Behavioral Loops, Cognitive Biases & Personality Traits"
 
 
 
18
  size_categories:
19
  - 1K<n<10K
20
  dataset_info:
@@ -58,10 +61,18 @@ dataset_info:
58
  dtype: string
59
  - name: name
60
  dtype: string
 
 
61
  - name: domain
62
  dtype: string
63
  - name: definition
64
  dtype: string
 
 
 
 
 
 
65
  splits:
66
  - name: train
67
  - config_name: personality_traits
@@ -76,6 +87,68 @@ dataset_info:
76
  dtype: string
77
  splits:
78
  - name: train
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
79
  task_categories:
80
  - text-classification
81
  - text-generation
@@ -96,41 +169,74 @@ configs:
96
  data_files:
97
  - split: train
98
  path: personality_traits/train.jsonl
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
99
  ---
100
 
101
  # Behavioral Taxonomy
102
 
103
- > A comprehensive, structured taxonomy of **1,140+ human behavioral loops**, **239 emotions**, **150 cognitive biases**, and **29 personality traits** for affective computing, NLP, and behavioral science research.
104
 
105
  ## Dataset Summary
106
 
107
- This dataset provides the foundational behavioral science data structures used by [AFFECTIVELY](https://affectively.ai). It categorizes human behavior into structured, machine-readable formats suitable for training and evaluating AI systems that work with human emotions and behavior.
 
 
108
 
109
  | Subset | Records | Description |
110
  |--------|---------|-------------|
111
- | `emotions` | 239 | Three-level emotion hierarchy (primary → secondary → tertiary) with Ekman mappings, valence/arousal, coping tips, physiological effects |
112
  | `behavioral_loops` | 1,140 | Structured behavioral patterns with given/when/then/result logic, taxonomy classification, veracity scores, and intervention strategies |
113
- | `cognitive_biases` | 150 | Cognitive bias taxonomy based on 4-domain functional classification with definitions, mechanisms, observable markers, and examples |
114
  | `personality_traits` | 29 | Personality trait archetypes with core patterns, observable behaviors, and mitigation strategies |
115
 
116
- **Total: 1,558 entries** across 4 subsets.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
117
 
118
  ## Quick Start
119
 
120
  ```python
121
  from datasets import load_dataset
122
 
123
- # Load all emotions
124
  emotions = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "emotions")
125
-
126
- # Load behavioral loops
127
  loops = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "behavioral_loops")
128
-
129
- # Load cognitive biases
130
  biases = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "cognitive_biases")
131
-
132
- # Load personality traits
133
  traits = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "personality_traits")
 
 
 
 
134
  ```
135
 
136
  ## Subset Details
@@ -144,7 +250,7 @@ Three-level hierarchy based on established emotion research:
144
  - **168 tertiary emotions** — e.g., jaded, disillusioned, resentful, euphoric
145
 
146
  Each emotion includes:
147
- - **Valence** (Positive/Negative/Neutral/Mixed) and **arousal** (Very Low → Very High)
148
  - **Ekman category** mapping to basic emotions
149
  - **Description** and real-world **example**
150
  - **Coping tips**: reflection, de-escalation, self-judgment, normalization
@@ -171,7 +277,16 @@ Each loop also includes:
171
  - **Intervention strategies**: interdict, minimize, recognize, leverage (with difficulty 1-10)
172
  - **Operator**: named psychological mechanism and explanation
173
 
174
- ### Cognitive Biases (150 entries)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
175
 
176
  Based on the 4-domain functional classification:
177
 
@@ -182,8 +297,6 @@ Based on the 4-domain functional classification:
182
  | NEED_TO_ACT_FAST | Decision-making shortcuts |
183
  | WHAT_TO_REMEMBER | Memory formation and recall biases |
184
 
185
- Each bias includes definition, mechanism, System 1/2 classification, observable linguistic markers, synonyms, antonyms, related biases, real-world examples, and research notes.
186
-
187
  ### Personality Traits (29 entries)
188
 
189
  Archetypal personality patterns with categories including:
@@ -192,14 +305,29 @@ Archetypal personality patterns with categories including:
192
  - CONTROL_ORIENTED (The Control Freak, Domineering Behavior)
193
  - ACHIEVEMENT_PERFORMANCE (The Achiever, The Perfectionist)
194
 
195
- Each trait includes core behavioral pattern, observable behaviors, and mitigation strategies.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
196
 
197
  ## Use Cases
198
 
199
  - **Emotion AI / Affective Computing** — train classifiers, build emotion wheels, design empathetic chatbots
200
  - **NLP & Text Classification** — emotion labels, bias detection, personality typing
201
- - **Mental Health Applications** — coping strategy recommendation, self-awareness tools
202
  - **Behavioral Analysis** — loop detection, intervention planning, pattern recognition
 
203
  - **Game Design & Narrative** — character personality systems, emotional arcs
204
  - **Human-Computer Interaction** — adaptive interfaces, sentiment-aware UX
205
 
@@ -217,8 +345,8 @@ import { getBehavioralLoops, getEmotions, getBiases, getTraits } from '@affectiv
217
 
218
  ```bibtex
219
  @dataset{affectively_behavioral_taxonomy_2026,
220
- author = {AFFECTIVELY},
221
- title = {Behavioral Taxonomy: Emotions, Behavioral Loops, Cognitive Biases \& Personality Traits},
222
  year = {2026},
223
  publisher = {HuggingFace},
224
  url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/buley/behavioral-taxonomy},
@@ -236,4 +364,6 @@ You are free to share and adapt this dataset for any purpose, even commercially,
236
 
237
  Published by [AFFECTIVELY](https://huggingface.co/affectively-ai) · Managed by [@buley](https://huggingface.co/buley)
238
 
 
 
239
  - [npm package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@affectively/behavioral-taxonomy) · [GitHub](https://github.com/affectively-ai/behavioral-taxonomy) · [All models](https://huggingface.co/affectively-ai) · [Edgework.ai](https://edgework.ai)
 
14
  - taxonomy
15
  - affectively
16
  - edgework
17
+ - mindfulness
18
+ - breathing
19
+ - technical-mindfulness
20
+ pretty_name: "Behavioral Taxonomy: Emotions, Loops, Biases, Traits & Mindfulness Techniques"
21
  size_categories:
22
  - 1K<n<10K
23
  dataset_info:
 
61
  dtype: string
62
  - name: name
63
  dtype: string
64
+ - name: source
65
+ dtype: string
66
  - name: domain
67
  dtype: string
68
  - name: definition
69
  dtype: string
70
+ - name: parent_mechanism
71
+ dtype: string
72
+ - name: synonym_of
73
+ dtype: string
74
+ - name: antonym_of
75
+ dtype: string
76
  splits:
77
  - name: train
78
  - config_name: personality_traits
 
87
  dtype: string
88
  splits:
89
  - name: train
90
+ - config_name: bias_mechanisms
91
+ features:
92
+ - name: id
93
+ dtype: string
94
+ - name: name
95
+ dtype: string
96
+ - name: definition
97
+ dtype: string
98
+ splits:
99
+ - name: train
100
+ - config_name: bias_synonyms
101
+ features:
102
+ - name: id
103
+ dtype: string
104
+ - name: primary
105
+ dtype: string
106
+ - name: notes
107
+ dtype: string
108
+ splits:
109
+ - name: train
110
+ - config_name: bias_antonyms
111
+ features:
112
+ - name: id
113
+ dtype: string
114
+ - name: opposite
115
+ dtype: string
116
+ - name: flipping_mechanism
117
+ dtype: string
118
+ - name: context
119
+ dtype: string
120
+ splits:
121
+ - name: train
122
+ - config_name: nonverbal_cues
123
+ features:
124
+ - name: id
125
+ dtype: string
126
+ - name: signal
127
+ dtype: string
128
+ - name: description
129
+ dtype: string
130
+ splits:
131
+ - name: train
132
+ - config_name: intervention_levers
133
+ features:
134
+ - name: id
135
+ dtype: string
136
+ - name: description
137
+ dtype: string
138
+ splits:
139
+ - name: train
140
+ - config_name: breathing_techniques
141
+ features:
142
+ - name: id
143
+ dtype: string
144
+ - name: name
145
+ dtype: string
146
+ - name: category
147
+ dtype: string
148
+ - name: overview
149
+ dtype: string
150
+ splits:
151
+ - name: train
152
  task_categories:
153
  - text-classification
154
  - text-generation
 
169
  data_files:
170
  - split: train
171
  path: personality_traits/train.jsonl
172
+ - config_name: bias_mechanisms
173
+ data_files:
174
+ - split: train
175
+ path: bias_mechanisms/train.jsonl
176
+ - config_name: bias_synonyms
177
+ data_files:
178
+ - split: train
179
+ path: bias_synonyms/train.jsonl
180
+ - config_name: bias_antonyms
181
+ data_files:
182
+ - split: train
183
+ path: bias_antonyms/train.jsonl
184
+ - config_name: nonverbal_cues
185
+ data_files:
186
+ - split: train
187
+ path: nonverbal_cues/train.jsonl
188
+ - config_name: intervention_levers
189
+ data_files:
190
+ - split: train
191
+ path: intervention_levers/train.jsonl
192
+ - config_name: breathing_techniques
193
+ data_files:
194
+ - split: train
195
+ path: breathing_techniques/train.jsonl
196
  ---
197
 
198
  # Behavioral Taxonomy
199
 
200
+ > A comprehensive, structured taxonomy for **technical mindfulness** — **239 emotions**, **1,140 behavioral loops**, **117 cognitive biases**, **29 personality traits**, **17 bias mechanisms**, **16 breathing techniques**, and more — for affective computing, NLP, and behavioral science research.
201
 
202
  ## Dataset Summary
203
 
204
+ This dataset provides the foundational behavioral science and mindfulness data structures used by [AFFECTIVELY](https://affectively.ai). It categorizes human behavior, cognition, and self-regulation into structured, machine-readable formats suitable for training and evaluating AI systems that work with human emotions and behavior.
205
+
206
+ ### Core Subsets
207
 
208
  | Subset | Records | Description |
209
  |--------|---------|-------------|
210
+ | `emotions` | 239 | Three-level emotion hierarchy (primary, secondary, tertiary) with Ekman mappings, valence/arousal, coping tips, physiological effects |
211
  | `behavioral_loops` | 1,140 | Structured behavioral patterns with given/when/then/result logic, taxonomy classification, veracity scores, and intervention strategies |
212
+ | `cognitive_biases` | 123 | Unified cognitive bias entries from 5 production sources — definitions, mechanisms, synonyms, antonyms, and domain classifications |
213
  | `personality_traits` | 29 | Personality trait archetypes with core patterns, observable behaviors, and mitigation strategies |
214
 
215
+ ### Supplementary Subsets
216
+
217
+ | Subset | Records | Description |
218
+ |--------|---------|-------------|
219
+ | `bias_mechanisms` | 17 | Cognitive mechanisms (heuristics) that generate derivative biases |
220
+ | `bias_synonyms` | 23 | Synonym/alias groups mapping alternative names to primary biases |
221
+ | `bias_antonyms` | 16 | Antonym pairs with flipping mechanisms (e.g., Optimism Bias <-> Pessimism Bias) |
222
+ | `nonverbal_cues` | 9 | Nonverbal communication patterns and contextual alerts |
223
+ | `intervention_levers` | 6 | Intervention lever types for behavioral change |
224
+ | `breathing_techniques` | 16 | Evidence-based breathing techniques with contraindications, benefits, and session guidance |
225
 
226
  ## Quick Start
227
 
228
  ```python
229
  from datasets import load_dataset
230
 
231
+ # Load core subsets
232
  emotions = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "emotions")
 
 
233
  loops = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "behavioral_loops")
 
 
234
  biases = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "cognitive_biases")
 
 
235
  traits = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "personality_traits")
236
+
237
+ # Load supplementary subsets
238
+ mechanisms = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "bias_mechanisms")
239
+ breathing = load_dataset("buley/behavioral-taxonomy", "breathing_techniques")
240
  ```
241
 
242
  ## Subset Details
 
250
  - **168 tertiary emotions** — e.g., jaded, disillusioned, resentful, euphoric
251
 
252
  Each emotion includes:
253
+ - **Valence** (Positive/Negative/Neutral/Mixed) and **arousal** (Very Low to Very High)
254
  - **Ekman category** mapping to basic emotions
255
  - **Description** and real-world **example**
256
  - **Coping tips**: reflection, de-escalation, self-judgment, normalization
 
277
  - **Intervention strategies**: interdict, minimize, recognize, leverage (with difficulty 1-10)
278
  - **Operator**: named psychological mechanism and explanation
279
 
280
+ ### Cognitive Biases (123 unified entries)
281
+
282
+ Built from **5 production data sources** — core definitions, mechanism derivatives, synonym aliases, antonym pairs, and domain classifications. Each bias is tagged with its `source` field indicating provenance:
283
+
284
+ | Source | Count | Description |
285
+ |--------|-------|-------------|
286
+ | `definition` | 16 | Full definitions with domains, System 1/2, observable markers, examples |
287
+ | `mechanism_derivative` | ~70 | Biases derived from 17 cognitive mechanisms (heuristics) |
288
+ | `synonym_alias` | ~20 | Alternative names linked to primary biases |
289
+ | `antonym` | ~10 | Bias poles with flipping mechanisms |
290
 
291
  Based on the 4-domain functional classification:
292
 
 
297
  | NEED_TO_ACT_FAST | Decision-making shortcuts |
298
  | WHAT_TO_REMEMBER | Memory formation and recall biases |
299
 
 
 
300
  ### Personality Traits (29 entries)
301
 
302
  Archetypal personality patterns with categories including:
 
305
  - CONTROL_ORIENTED (The Control Freak, Domineering Behavior)
306
  - ACHIEVEMENT_PERFORMANCE (The Achiever, The Perfectionist)
307
 
308
+ ### Breathing Techniques (16 entries)
309
+
310
+ Evidence-based breathing practices for emotional regulation:
311
+
312
+ - **Categories**: Foundational/Calming, Energizing, Advanced, Specialized
313
+ - Each includes: overview, contraindications, recommended session duration, difficulty level, primary benefits
314
+ - Designed for integration into mindfulness applications and therapeutic tools
315
+
316
+ ### Bias Mechanisms (17 entries)
317
+
318
+ The cognitive heuristics that generate derivative biases — e.g., Availability Heuristic, Prospect Theory, Attribution Theory, Cognitive Dissonance. Each mechanism maps to its derivative biases.
319
+
320
+ ### Bias Synonyms (23 entries) and Antonyms (16 entries)
321
+
322
+ Synonym groups map alternative names to primary biases (e.g., Gambler's Fallacy = Monte Carlo Fallacy). Antonym pairs include flipping mechanisms explaining when one bias pole activates over another (e.g., Optimism Bias flips to Pessimism Bias via depression/anxiety).
323
 
324
  ## Use Cases
325
 
326
  - **Emotion AI / Affective Computing** — train classifiers, build emotion wheels, design empathetic chatbots
327
  - **NLP & Text Classification** — emotion labels, bias detection, personality typing
328
+ - **Mental Health & Mindfulness** — coping strategies, breathing exercises, self-awareness tools
329
  - **Behavioral Analysis** — loop detection, intervention planning, pattern recognition
330
+ - **Cognitive Bias Research** — unified bias taxonomy with mechanism provenance and synonym resolution
331
  - **Game Design & Narrative** — character personality systems, emotional arcs
332
  - **Human-Computer Interaction** — adaptive interfaces, sentiment-aware UX
333
 
 
345
 
346
  ```bibtex
347
  @dataset{affectively_behavioral_taxonomy_2026,
348
+ author = {Taylor Buley},
349
+ title = {Behavioral Taxonomy: Emotions, Loops, Biases, Traits \& Mindfulness Techniques},
350
  year = {2026},
351
  publisher = {HuggingFace},
352
  url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/buley/behavioral-taxonomy},
 
364
 
365
  Published by [AFFECTIVELY](https://huggingface.co/affectively-ai) · Managed by [@buley](https://huggingface.co/buley)
366
 
367
+ AFFECTIVELY transforms high-entropy emotional experiences into low-entropy, actionable insights through technical mindfulness.
368
+
369
  - [npm package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@affectively/behavioral-taxonomy) · [GitHub](https://github.com/affectively-ai/behavioral-taxonomy) · [All models](https://huggingface.co/affectively-ai) · [Edgework.ai](https://edgework.ai)
bias_antonyms/train.jsonl ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {"id":"Optimism_Bias","opposite":"Pessimism_Bias","flipping_mechanism":"Emotional State: Depression/Anxiety levels (Depressive Realism)","context":"When user shows signs of depression or anxiety, flip Optimism to Pessimism"}
2
+ {"id":"Pessimism_Bias","opposite":"Optimism_Bias","flipping_mechanism":"Emotional State: Low depression/anxiety, positive mood","context":"When user shows positive mood and low anxiety, flip Pessimism to Optimism"}
3
+ {"id":"Neophilia","opposite":"Status_Quo_Bias","flipping_mechanism":"Personality Trait: Openness to Experience (Big Five)","context":"Low openness → Status Quo Bias; High openness → Neophilia"}
4
+ {"id":"Status_Quo_Bias","opposite":"Neophilia","flipping_mechanism":"Personality Trait: Openness to Experience (Big Five)","context":"High openness → Neophilia; Low openness → Status Quo Bias"}
5
+ {"id":"Gamblers_Fallacy","opposite":"Hot_Hand_Fallacy","flipping_mechanism":"Perception of Agency: Random (Gambler's) vs. Skill-based (Hot Hand)","context":"Perceived randomness → Gambler's Fallacy; Perceived skill → Hot Hand Fallacy"}
6
+ {"id":"Hot_Hand_Fallacy","opposite":"Gamblers_Fallacy","flipping_mechanism":"Perception of Agency: Random (Gambler's) vs. Skill-based (Hot Hand)","context":"Perceived skill → Hot Hand Fallacy; Perceived randomness → Gambler's Fallacy"}
7
+ {"id":"Spotlight_Effect","opposite":"Illusion_of_Transparency","flipping_mechanism":"Focus: External/Behavioral vs. Internal/Mental state","context":"Focus on external attention → Spotlight Effect; Focus on internal thoughts → Illusion of Transparency"}
8
+ {"id":"Illusion_of_Transparency","opposite":"Spotlight_Effect","flipping_mechanism":"Focus: External/Behavioral vs. Internal/Mental state","context":"Focus on internal thoughts → Illusion of Transparency; Focus on external attention → Spotlight Effect"}
9
+ {"id":"Halo_Effect","opposite":"Horns_Effect","flipping_mechanism":"Valence: Initial impression positive vs. negative","context":"Positive initial impression → Halo Effect; Negative initial impression → Horns Effect"}
10
+ {"id":"Horns_Effect","opposite":"Halo_Effect","flipping_mechanism":"Valence: Initial impression positive vs. negative","context":"Negative initial impression → Horns Effect; Positive initial impression → Halo Effect"}
11
+ {"id":"Overconfidence_Effect","opposite":"Hard_Easy_Effect","flipping_mechanism":"Task Difficulty: Overconfident on hard tasks, underconfident on easy tasks","context":"Hard tasks → Overconfidence; Easy tasks → Underconfidence (Hard-Easy Effect)"}
12
+ {"id":"Hard_Easy_Effect","opposite":"Overconfidence_Effect","flipping_mechanism":"Task Difficulty: Overconfident on hard tasks, underconfident on easy tasks","context":"Easy tasks → Underconfidence; Hard tasks → Overconfidence"}
13
+ {"id":"Self_Serving_Bias","opposite":"Impostor_Syndrome","flipping_mechanism":"Self-Esteem: High self-esteem vs. Low self-esteem","context":"High self-esteem → Self-Serving Bias; Low self-esteem → Impostor Syndrome"}
14
+ {"id":"Negativity_Bias","opposite":"Positivity_Effect","flipping_mechanism":"Emotional State: Threat detection vs. Emotion regulation","context":"Threat-focused → Negativity Bias; Emotion regulation → Positivity Effect"}
15
+ {"id":"Positivity_Effect","opposite":"Negativity_Bias","flipping_mechanism":"Emotional State: Threat detection vs. Emotion regulation","context":"Emotion regulation → Positivity Effect; Threat-focused → Negativity Bias"}
16
+ {"id":"Impostor_Syndrome","opposite":"Self_Serving_Bias","flipping_mechanism":"Self-Esteem: Low self-esteem vs. High self-esteem","context":"Low self-esteem → Impostor Syndrome; High self-esteem → Self-Serving Bias"}
bias_mechanisms/train.jsonl ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {"id":"Availability_Heuristic","name":"Availability Heuristic","definition":"Judging probability by ease of recall.","derivative_biases":["Availability_Heuristic","Survivorship_Bias","Recency_Effect","Primacy_Effect","Base_Rate_Fallacy","Anecdotal_Fallacy"]}
2
+ {"id":"Representativeness_Heuristic","name":"Representativeness Heuristic","definition":"Judging probability by similarity to a prototype.","derivative_biases":["Conjunction_Fallacy","Gamblers_Fallacy","Insensitivity_to_Sample_Size","Stereotyping","Base_Rate_Neglect","Hot_Hand_Fallacy"]}
3
+ {"id":"Affect_Heuristic","name":"Affect Heuristic","definition":"Judging decision by emotional 'tag' or gut feeling.","derivative_biases":["Halo_Effect","Neglect_of_Probability","Zero_Risk_Bias","In_Group_Bias","Out_Group_Homogeneity","Identifiable_Victim_Effect"]}
4
+ {"id":"Anchoring_Adjustment","name":"Anchoring & Adjustment","definition":"Estimating values by adjusting from a starting point.","derivative_biases":["Anchoring_Bias","Spotlight_Effect","Illusion_of_Transparency","Planning_Fallacy","Conservatism_Bayesian"]}
5
+ {"id":"Social_Proof_Compliance","name":"Social Proof / Compliance","definition":"Assuming the group/leader is correct.","derivative_biases":["Bandwagon_Effect","Conformity_Bias","Groupthink","Authority_Bias"]}
6
+ {"id":"Prospect_Theory","name":"Prospect Theory (Value Function)","definition":"Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses.","derivative_biases":["Loss_Aversion","Endowment_Effect","Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","Disposition_Effect","Status_Quo_Bias","Framing_Effect"]}
7
+ {"id":"Attribution_Theory","name":"Attribution Theory","definition":"Errors in assigning cause to behavior.","derivative_biases":["Fundamental_Attribution_Error","Actor_Observer_Bias","Self_Serving_Bias","Ultimate_Attribution_Error","Group_Attribution_Error"]}
8
+ {"id":"Cognitive_Dissonance","name":"Cognitive Dissonance","definition":"Discomfort from conflicting beliefs/actions.","derivative_biases":["IKEA_Effect","Ben_Franklin_Effect","Effort_Justification","Post_Purchase_Rationalization","Choice_Supportive_Bias"]}
9
+ {"id":"Processing_Fluency","name":"Processing Fluency","definition":"Ease of processing information influences judgments.","derivative_biases":["Illusory_Truth_Effect","Rhyme_as_Reason_Effect","Well_Traveled_Road_Effect"]}
10
+ {"id":"Familiarity_Heuristic","name":"Familiarity Heuristic","definition":"Preferring familiar things because they feel safer.","derivative_biases":["Mere_Exposure_Effect"]}
11
+ {"id":"Pattern_Recognition","name":"Pattern Recognition","definition":"Detecting patterns, even when none exist.","derivative_biases":["Clustering_Illusion","Gamblers_Fallacy","Hot_Hand_Fallacy","Pareidolia"]}
12
+ {"id":"Categorization_Heuristic","name":"Categorization Heuristic","definition":"Using categories to simplify complex information.","derivative_biases":["Stereotyping","Essentialism","Mental_Accounting"]}
13
+ {"id":"Ego_Centric_Processing","name":"Ego-Centric Processing","definition":"Processing information through self-referential lens.","derivative_biases":["Self_Relevance_Effect","Egocentric_Bias","False_Consensus_Effect"]}
14
+ {"id":"Emotion_Regulation","name":"Emotion Regulation","definition":"Managing emotional states influences memory and judgment.","derivative_biases":["Positivity_Effect","Fading_Affect_Bias","Mood_Congruent_Memory_Bias"]}
15
+ {"id":"Loss_Aversion","name":"Loss Aversion","definition":"Preferring to avoid losses over acquiring equivalent gains.","derivative_biases":["Loss_Aversion","Endowment_Effect","Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","Status_Quo_Bias"]}
16
+ {"id":"Self_Enhancement","name":"Self-Enhancement","definition":"Maintaining positive self-image.","derivative_biases":["Illusory_Superiority","Self_Serving_Bias","Third_Person_Effect"]}
17
+ {"id":"Anxiety_Reduction","name":"Anxiety Reduction","definition":"Reducing anxiety through cognitive strategies.","derivative_biases":["Optimism_Bias","Just_World_Hypothesis","Ostrich_Effect","System_Justification"]}
bias_synonyms/train.jsonl ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {"id":"Confirmation_Bias","primary":"Confirmation_Bias","aliases":["Myside_Bias","Congruence_Bias","Cherry_Picking"],"notes":"Myside is argumentative; Congruence is scientific testing; Cherry Picking is data selection."}
2
+ {"id":"Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","primary":"Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","aliases":["Irrational_Escalation","Concorde_Effect","Escalation_of_Commitment"],"notes":"Concorde Effect is the political instance; Escalation involves active investment increase."}
3
+ {"id":"Fundamental_Attribution_Error","primary":"Fundamental_Attribution_Error","aliases":["Correspondence_Bias","Overattribution_Effect"],"notes":"Correspondence Bias assumes behavior matches personality; FAE is the general error."}
4
+ {"id":"Availability_Heuristic","primary":"Availability_Heuristic","aliases":["Availability_Bias","Recency_Bias","Vividness_Effect"],"notes":"Recency is purely temporal; Availability includes emotional vividness."}
5
+ {"id":"Hyperbolic_Discounting","primary":"Hyperbolic_Discounting","aliases":["Present_Bias","Time_Inconsistency"],"notes":"Hyperbolic describes the mathematical curve; Present Bias is the behavioral result."}
6
+ {"id":"Bizarreness_Effect","primary":"Bizarreness_Effect","aliases":["Von_Restorff_Effect","Isolation_Effect"],"notes":"Von Restorff usually refers to lists; Bizarreness to narrative content."}
7
+ {"id":"Decoy_Effect","primary":"Decoy_Effect","aliases":["Asymmetric_Dominance_Effect","Attraction_Effect"],"notes":"Asymmetric Dominance is the technical economic term."}
8
+ {"id":"Bandwagon_Effect","primary":"Bandwagon_Effect","aliases":["Herd_Behavior","Groupthink"],"notes":"Bandwagon is adoption based on popularity; Groupthink is consensus seeking at the cost of quality."}
9
+ {"id":"Dunning_Kruger_Effect","primary":"Dunning_Kruger_Effect","aliases":["Illusory_Superiority","Overconfidence"],"notes":"DK specifically links low ability to high confidence; Illusory Superiority is general."}
10
+ {"id":"IKEA_Effect","primary":"IKEA_Effect","aliases":["Effort_Justification"],"notes":"IKEA is specific to creation/assembly of products."}
11
+ {"id":"False_Consensus_Effect","primary":"False_Consensus_Effect","aliases":["Projection_Bias"],"notes":"False Consensus is assuming others agree; Projection is assuming future self agrees."}
12
+ {"id":"Illusory_Truth_Effect","primary":"Illusory_Truth_Effect","aliases":["Truth_Effect","Reiteration_Effect"],"notes":"All refer to the same phenomenon of repetition increasing perceived truthfulness."}
13
+ {"id":"Mere_Exposure_Effect","primary":"Mere_Exposure_Effect","aliases":["Familiarity_Principle"],"notes":"Both refer to preference for familiar things."}
14
+ {"id":"Empathy_Gap","primary":"Empathy_Gap","aliases":["Hot_Cold_Empathy_Gap"],"notes":"Both refer to underestimating influence of visceral drives."}
15
+ {"id":"Frequency_Illusion","primary":"Frequency_Illusion","aliases":["Baader_Meinhof_Phenomenon"],"notes":"Both refer to seeing something everywhere after first noticing it."}
16
+ {"id":"Anchoring_Bias","primary":"Anchoring_Bias","aliases":["Focalism"],"notes":"Both refer to over-reliance on initial information."}
17
+ {"id":"Observer_Expectancy_Effect","primary":"Observer_Expectancy_Effect","aliases":["Experimenters_Bias"],"notes":"Both refer to researcher bias influencing participants."}
18
+ {"id":"Gamblers_Fallacy","primary":"Gamblers_Fallacy","aliases":["Monte_Carlo_Fallacy"],"notes":"Both refer to misconception of chance in independent events."}
19
+ {"id":"Illusory_Superiority","primary":"Illusory_Superiority","aliases":["Above_Average_Effect","Superiority_Bias"],"notes":"All refer to overestimating one's qualities relative to others."}
20
+ {"id":"Lake_Wobegon_Effect","primary":"Lake_Wobegon_Effect","aliases":["Illusory_Superiority"],"notes":"Lake Wobegon is a specific instance of illusory superiority."}
21
+ {"id":"Law_of_the_Instrument","primary":"Law_of_the_Instrument","aliases":["Maslows_Hammer","Golden_Hammer"],"notes":"All refer to over-reliance on familiar tools."}
22
+ {"id":"Bikeshedding","primary":"Bikeshedding","aliases":["Law_of_Triviality"],"notes":"Both refer to disproportionate focus on trivial issues."}
23
+ {"id":"Ambiguity_Effect","primary":"Ambiguity_Effect","aliases":["Ambiguity_Aversion"],"notes":"Both refer to avoiding options with unknown probabilities."}
24
+ {"id":"Halo_Effect","primary":"Halo_Effect","aliases":["Physical_Attractiveness_Stereotype"],"notes":"Halo Effect is broader; Physical Attractiveness Stereotype is a specific instance."}
breathing_techniques/train.jsonl ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {"id":"resonant-breathing-coherent-breathing","name":"Resonant Breathing (Coherent Breathing)","category":"Foundational and Calming Techniques","difficulty_level":"Intermediate","practice_frequency":"Daily","overview":"Breathing at 5-6 breaths per minute to maximize heart rate variability and bring heart, lungs, and brain into coherence.","contraindications":"Generally safe when done comfortably. Do not force long breaths. Stop if lightheaded. People with uncontrolled asthma, severe COPD, or cardiovascular issues should consult a clinician before structured pacing.","recommended_session":"10 minutes at 5–6 breaths per minute. Try 5s inhale, 5s exhale. Extend to 20 minutes for deeper HRV effects.","duration_min":5,"duration_max":20,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Blood Pressure Regulation","Focus Enhancement","Stress Relief"]}
2
+ {"id":"box-breathing-square-breathing","name":"Box Breathing (Square Breathing)","category":"Foundational and Calming Techniques","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"Daily or as needed","overview":"A pattern of four equal phases—inhale, hold, exhale, hold—to regulate the nervous system and calm the mind.","contraindications":"Generally safe. If breath holding is uncomfortable, use a shorter count or skip the holds (which turns it into paced breathing). Pregnant individuals should be cautious with breath holds. Stop if dizzy or stressed.","recommended_session":"4 rounds of 4 counts each, extending to 5 minutes or more. Inhale 4s, Hold 4s, Exhale 4s, Hold 4s.","duration_min":2,"duration_max":10,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Stress Reduction","Focus and Concentration","Nervous System Regulation","Mindfulness"]}
3
+ {"id":"4-7-8-breathing","name":"4-7-8 Breathing","category":"Foundational and Calming Techniques","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"Twice daily, extending up to 4 cycles","overview":"A calming practice where the inhale is 4 counts, the breath is held for 7 counts, and the exhale is 8 counts, promoting parasympathetic activation.","contraindications":"Generally safe. If breath holding is uncomfortable, use a shorter hold or none at all. Pregnant individuals should use caution with breath holds. Stop if dizzy or stressed.","recommended_session":"4 cycles, 2 times daily. Inhale 4s, Hold 7s, Exhale 8s. Gradually increase hold and exhale time as comfortable.","duration_min":1,"duration_max":5,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Anxiety Reduction","Stress Relief","Sleep Aid","Nervous System Regulation"]}
4
+ {"id":"sama-vritti-equal-ratio-breathing","name":"Sama Vritti (Equal Ratio Breathing)","category":"Foundational and Calming Techniques","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"Daily or as needed","overview":"Inhaling and exhaling for the same duration (e.g., 4 seconds each) to achieve balance in the nervous system.","contraindications":"Generally safe. Do not force the breath or strain. Stop if lightheaded or uncomfortable.","recommended_session":"5–10 minutes. Start with 4s inhale, 4s exhale. Gradually increase to 6s/6s or 8s/8s as comfort allows.","duration_min":5,"duration_max":10,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Stress Relief","Focus Enhancement","Nervous System Balance","Mindfulness"]}
5
+ {"id":"diaphragmatic-breathing-abdominal-breathing","name":"Diaphragmatic Breathing (Abdominal Breathing)","category":"Foundational and Calming Techniques","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"Daily","overview":"Focuses on fully engaging the diaphragm and abdominal muscles to achieve deeper, slower breaths, maximizing oxygen exchange and promoting relaxation.","contraindications":"Generally safe. Stop if dizzy. Be gentle post-surgery or during acute respiratory distress.","recommended_session":"5–10 minutes. Practice lying down or seated. Inhale, letting the abdomen rise. Exhale, letting the abdomen fall. Focus on making the breath deep and smooth, not fast.","duration_min":5,"duration_max":15,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Stress Relief","Nervous System Regulation","Core Stabilization","Lung Capacity Improvement"]}
6
+ {"id":"three-part-breath-dirgha-pranayama","name":"Three Part Breath (Dirgha Pranayama)","category":"Foundational and Calming Techniques","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"Daily","overview":"A foundational yogic breathing technique that promotes full and complete breathing by systematically filling three regions: the belly (abdomen), the ribcage (middle chest), and the upper chest. This methodical approach ensures the lungs are utilized to their full capacity, enhancing oxygen intake and promoting relaxation.","contraindications":"Generally safe when done comfortably. Do not force the breath or strain. Stop if lightheaded or uncomfortable. People with respiratory conditions or cardiovascular issues should consult a healthcare provider before practicing.","recommended_session":"5–15 minutes. Practice lying down or seated. Inhale: fill belly (2s), expand ribcage (2s), lift upper chest (2s). Exhale: release chest (2s), contract ribcage (2s), draw navel to spine (2s). Focus on smooth, sequential transitions.","duration_min":5,"duration_max":15,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Stress Relief","Nervous System Regulation","Lung Capacity Improvement","Mindfulness"]}
7
+ {"id":"physiological-sigh-the-double-inhale","name":"Physiological Sigh (The Double Inhale)","category":"Foundational and Calming Techniques","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"As needed, for acute stress relief","overview":"A quick, sharp double inhale through the nose followed by a prolonged, audible exhale through the mouth. Scientifically proven to quickly relieve anxiety and stress by reinflating collapsed alveoli in the lungs.","contraindications":"Generally safe. Stop if feeling lightheaded or anxious. People with uncontrolled asthma or severe COPD should use caution with forced exhalations.","recommended_session":"3–5 rounds, as needed. Pattern: slow deep nasal inhale + quick top-up nasal inhale, followed by a prolonged, slow mouth exhale (longer than inhale). Practice seated, relaxed posture.","duration_min":1,"duration_max":5,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Anxiety Reduction","Focus Enhancement","Sleep Aid","Stress Relief"]}
8
+ {"id":"hrv-biofeedback-resonance-frequency-training","name":"HRV Biofeedback (Resonance Frequency Training)","category":"Modern and Therapeutic Breathwork Modalities","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"Regular","overview":"Breathing at your personal resonance frequency while receiving live heart rate variability (HRV) feedback to maximize respiratory sinus arrhythmia and vagal engagement.","contraindications":"Stop if you feel dizzy or unwell. People with cardiovascular, respiratory, or psychiatric conditions should consult a clinician before starting new breath or biofeedback protocols.","recommended_session":"5–15 minutes. Breathe at individualized resonance frequency (~4.5–6.5 breaths/min) with relaxed nasal breathing. Aim for smooth, low-effort inhales and exhales.","duration_min":5,"duration_max":15,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Anxiety Reduction","Blood Pressure Regulation","Focus Enhancement","Stress Relief"]}
9
+ {"id":"wim-hof-method-whm-breathing","name":"Wim Hof Method (WHm) Breathing","category":"Dynamic and Energizing Techniques","difficulty_level":"Intermediate","practice_frequency":"Daily or several times per week","overview":"A cycle of 30-40 fast, deep breaths followed by a long breath hold (retention) on the exhale, and a final short hold on the inhale. It induces a temporary state of respiratory alkalosis and adrenaline release.","contraindications":"Never practice in or near water, while driving, or standing where falling is a risk. Not recommended for pregnant women, people with epilepsy, severe cardiovascular conditions (including high blood pressure), or recent surgery. Consult a doctor if you have chronic health issues.","recommended_session":"3–4 rounds of 30–40 power breaths followed by a breath retention on the exhale. Start with 3 rounds and gradually increase to 4. Total time: 10–15 minutes.","duration_min":10,"duration_max":20,"requires_guidance":true,"primary_benefits":["Increased Energy and Alertness","Immune System Modulation","Stress Resilience","Pain Management"]}
10
+ {"id":"bhastrika-bellows-breath","name":"Bhastrika (Bellows Breath)","category":"Dynamic and Energizing Techniques","difficulty_level":"Intermediate","practice_frequency":"Daily, preferably in the morning","overview":"A forceful and rhythmic series of rapid inhales and exhales powered by abdominal contractions, generating heat and increasing energy.","contraindications":"Avoid if pregnant, have high blood pressure, heart disease, hernia, peptic ulcers, or detached retina. Not for those with severe asthma or recent abdominal surgery. Practice on an empty stomach. Stop immediately if dizzy, nauseous, or experiencing pain.","recommended_session":"3 rounds of 10–30 rapid breaths, with a breath hold (Kumbhaka) after the final exhale. Increase speed and duration gradually. Beginners: 10 breaths/round.","duration_min":3,"duration_max":10,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Increased Energy and Alertness","Detoxification","Metabolism Boost","Warming the Body"]}
11
+ {"id":"kapalabhati-skull-shining-breath","name":"Kapalabhati (Skull Shining Breath)","category":"Dynamic and Energizing Techniques","difficulty_level":"Intermediate","practice_frequency":"Daily, preferably in the morning","overview":"A cleansing and energizing pranayama where the focus is on short, sharp, forceful exhalations driven by the abdomen, with passive, automatic inhalations.","contraindications":"Avoid if pregnant, have high blood pressure, heart disease, hernia, peptic ulcers, or detached retina. Not for those with severe asthma or recent abdominal surgery. Practice on an empty stomach. Stop immediately if dizzy or nauseous.","recommended_session":"3 rounds of 30–60 rapid exhalations, with a period of rest or breath retention (Kumbhaka) in between. Beginners: 30 breaths/round.","duration_min":5,"duration_max":10,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Increased Energy and Alertness","Detoxification","Mental Clarity","Warming the Body"]}
12
+ {"id":"nadi-shodhana-alternate-nostril-breathing","name":"Nadi Shodhana (Alternate Nostril Breathing)","category":"Balancing and Foundational Pranayama","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"Daily, morning or evening","overview":"A technique to alternate breathing between the right and left nostrils, balancing the *pingala* (solar/activating) and *ida* (lunar/calming) energy channels and regulating the nervous system.","contraindications":"Generally safe. If a nostril is blocked, practice only through the clear nostril or wait until clear. Stop if dizzy or uncomfortable. Avoid forced breathing or holds if pregnant or have high blood pressure.","recommended_session":"5–10 minutes. Start with an equal ratio (e.g., 4s inhale, 4s exhale). Gradually increase time and potentially introduce a light hold (Kumbhaka) if comfortable (e.g., 1:4:2 ratio).","duration_min":5,"duration_max":15,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Stress Relief","Nervous System Balance","Mental Clarity","Focus Enhancement"]}
13
+ {"id":"bhramari-humming-bee-breath","name":"Bhramari (Humming Bee Breath)","category":"Calming and Vibrational Pranayama","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"Daily, especially before sleep or meditation","overview":"A calming practice involving inhaling deeply and exhaling slowly while making a gentle, continuous humming sound (like a bee), which creates vibrations that soothe the nervous system.","contraindications":"Generally safe. Avoid excessive pressure on the ears/face. Individuals with severe ear infections or glaucoma should avoid Shambhavi Mudra/applying too much pressure to the ears.","recommended_session":"5–10 minutes (5–10 rounds). Inhale deep, close ears/eyes with fingers, exhale with a soft, steady hum. Focus on the vibration in the head/forehead.","duration_min":5,"duration_max":10,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Anxiety Reduction","Sleep Aid","Stress Relief","Focus Enhancement"]}
14
+ {"id":"ujjayi-pranayama-ocean-breath","name":"Ujjayi Pranayama (Ocean Breath)","category":"Balancing and Foundational Pranayama","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"Daily, often integrated into yoga practice (Asana)","overview":"A breath practice involving a gentle constriction in the back of the throat on both the inhale and exhale, creating an audible, ocean-like sound. It helps maintain rhythm, focus, and heat.","contraindications":"Generally safe. If constriction causes strain, stop or reduce the intensity. Avoid if you have acute ear pain, a cold, or sinus issues.","recommended_session":"5–10 minutes of focused Ujjayi, or continuous practice during a yoga session. Focus on making the length of inhale and exhale equal (Sama Vritti).","duration_min":5,"duration_max":15,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Focus Enhancement","Stress Relief","Warming the Body","Nervous System Regulation"]}
15
+ {"id":"sitali-pranayama-cooling-breath","name":"Sitali Pranayama (Cooling Breath)","category":"Cooling and Calming Techniques","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"As needed, especially in warm weather or for high body temperature/agitation","overview":"A cooling breath where the inhale is drawn through a rolled or pursed tongue, followed by an exhale through the nose, lowering body temperature and calming the mind.","contraindications":"Avoid in very cold environments, if you have a sensitive respiratory system, or low blood pressure. If you cannot roll your tongue, use Sitkari (Hissing Breath).","recommended_session":"5–10 minutes (5–10 rounds). Inhale through rolled tongue, exhale through nose. Focus on the sensation of coolness.","duration_min":5,"duration_max":10,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Body Cooling","Stress Relief","Soothes Agitation","Thirst Reduction"]}
16
+ {"id":"sitkari-pranayama-hissing-breath","name":"Sitkari Pranayama (Hissing Breath)","category":"Cooling and Calming Techniques","difficulty_level":"Beginner","practice_frequency":"As needed, especially in warm weather or for high body temperature/agitation","overview":"A cooling breath used when the tongue cannot be rolled (Sitali). The teeth are gently clenched, and air is inhaled through the small gap with a soft hissing sound, followed by a nasal exhale.","contraindications":"Avoid in very cold environments, if you have very sensitive teeth, or low blood pressure.","recommended_session":"5–10 minutes (5–10 rounds). Inhale through clenched teeth (hissing sound), exhale through nose. Focus on the sensation of coolness.","duration_min":5,"duration_max":10,"requires_guidance":false,"primary_benefits":["Body Cooling","Stress Relief","Soothes Agitation","Thirst Reduction"]}
cognitive_biases/train.jsonl CHANGED
@@ -1,16 +1,123 @@
1
- {"id":"Availability_Heuristic","name":"Availability Heuristic","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Primacy_of_Availability_and_Repetition","category":"INFORMATION_PROCESSING","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to overestimate the likelihood of events based on the ease with which examples come to mind. If an instance is readily retrieved—due to recency, vividness, or emotional impact—it is judged as frequent and probable.","mechanism":"Availability_Heuristic","core_pattern":"Relying on immediate examples that come to mind (often emotionally charged or recent) rather than comprehensive data","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative universalizes a specific, recent, or emotional event. Consider broader context and statistical data.","observable_markers":["You always","This always happens","Every time","It's like that time","I remember when"],"synonyms":["Availability_Bias","Recency_Bias","Vividness_Effect"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Survivorship_Bias","Recency_Effect","Primacy_Effect","Anecdotal_Fallacy"],"related_heuristics":["Availability_Heuristic"],"examples":["After seeing a plane crash on TV, I'm afraid to fly","I remember that one time it rained, so it must rain often"],"research_notes":"Causes skew in risk assessment (e.g., fearing plane crashes more than car accidents). Triggered by vivid media, recent trauma, high emotional valence.","layer_associations":[5,6]}
2
- {"id":"Attentional_Bias","name":"Attentional Bias","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Primacy_of_Availability_and_Repetition","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency for an individual's perception to be affected by their recurring thoughts at the time. We pay attention to what we are already thinking about, creating a feedback loop of salience.","mechanism":"Other","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: attention is focused on specific themes. Consider whether this focus is helpful or creating a feedback loop.","observable_markers":["I keep noticing","I can't stop thinking about","Everything reminds me of"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Frequency_Illusion"],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":["When I'm anxious, I notice every potential threat","After buying a car, I see that model everywhere"],"research_notes":"Critical in modeling addiction or anxiety, where cues related to the condition become hyper-salient.","layer_associations":[2,5]}
3
- {"id":"Illusory_Truth_Effect","name":"Illusory Truth Effect","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Primacy_of_Availability_and_Repetition","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to believe false information to be correct after repeated exposure. Repetition increases processing fluency, which the brain misinterprets as a signal of truthfulness.","mechanism":"Processing_Fluency","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: belief may be based on repetition rather than evidence. Consider verifying the source and facts.","observable_markers":["I've heard that before","Everyone says","It's common knowledge","They keep saying"],"synonyms":["Truth_Effect","Reiteration_Effect"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Mere_Exposure_Effect"],"related_heuristics":["Processing_Fluency"],"examples":["After hearing a claim multiple times, I believe it's true","Repeated exposure to misinformation makes it seem credible"],"research_notes":"A foundational mechanism for the spread of misinformation and propaganda.","layer_associations":[5,6,7]}
4
- {"id":"Mere_Exposure_Effect","name":"Mere Exposure Effect","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Primacy_of_Availability_and_Repetition","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The psychological phenomenon by which people tend to develop a preference for things merely because they are familiar with them. In evolutionary terms, 'familiar' implies 'safe'.","mechanism":"Familiarity_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: preference may be based on familiarity rather than quality. Consider evaluating options objectively.","observable_markers":["I prefer","It's familiar","I know this","I've seen this before"],"synonyms":["Familiarity_Principle"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Illusory_Truth_Effect"],"related_heuristics":["Familiarity_Heuristic"],"examples":["I prefer brands I've seen advertised","Familiar faces seem more trustworthy"],"research_notes":"Application: Brand recognition and advertising optimization.","layer_associations":[2,7]}
5
- {"id":"Confirmation_Bias","name":"Confirmation Bias","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Confirmation_and_Belief_Maintenance","category":"INFORMATION_PROCESSING","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.","mechanism":"Cognitive_Dissonance","core_pattern":"Tendency to search for, interpret, and recall information that confirms preexisting beliefs","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative focuses on data that supports the core story. Consider alternative interpretations and contradictory evidence.","observable_markers":["That's exactly what I thought","This proves","As I suspected","I knew it","See, I told you"],"synonyms":["Myside_Bias","Congruence_Bias","Cherry_Picking"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Selective_Perception","Backfire_Effect"],"related_heuristics":["Cognitive_Dissonance"],"examples":["I only notice evidence that supports my view","I interpret ambiguous information in favor of my beliefs"],"research_notes":"Sub-types: Biased Search, Biased Interpretation, Biased Recall. Unlike Desirability Bias (believing what we want to be true), Confirmation Bias supports what we already believe, even if it is negative.","layer_associations":[5,6]}
6
- {"id":"Fundamental_Attribution_Error","name":"Fundamental Attribution Error","domain":"NOT_ENOUGH_MEANING","subcategory":"Mental_Modeling_of_Others","category":"PERCEPTION_ATTRIBUTION","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency for people to under-emphasize situational explanations for an individual's observed behavior while over-emphasizing dispositional and personality-based explanations.","mechanism":"Attribution_Theory","core_pattern":"Attributes other's behavior to character (internal) while attributing own behavior to situation (external)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative attributes outcome to personality rather than context. Consider situational factors and external circumstances.","observable_markers":["He is just","She's always","They never","He's a","She's such a","That's just how they are"],"synonyms":["Correspondence_Bias","Overattribution_Effect"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Actor_Observer_Bias","Ultimate_Attribution_Error"],"related_heuristics":["Attribution_Theory"],"examples":["He's late because he's lazy","She failed because she's not smart","They're rude because they're a bad person"],"research_notes":"Correspondence Bias assumes behavior matches personality; FAE is the general error.","layer_associations":[2,7]}
7
- {"id":"Self_Serving_Bias","name":"Self-Serving Bias","domain":"NEED_TO_ACT_FAST","subcategory":"Ego_and_Confidence","category":"PERCEPTION_ATTRIBUTION","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to perceive oneself in an overly favorable manner. Specifically, attributing success to internal factors (skill) and failure to external factors (luck/situation).","mechanism":"Self_Enhancement","core_pattern":"Tendency to claim more credit for success than is due, or to see oneself as central to events","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative emphasizes personal agency in positive outcomes. Consider collaborative contributions and external factors in both success and failure.","observable_markers":["I made it happen","It was all because of me","I was the one who","Without me","I succeeded because I'm skilled","I failed because of bad luck"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":["Impostor_Syndrome"],"related_biases":["Actor_Observer_Bias","Illusory_Superiority"],"related_heuristics":["Self_Enhancement","Attribution_Theory"],"examples":["I got the promotion because I'm talented","I lost because the conditions were unfair"],"research_notes":"Antonym: Depressive Realism. Mechanism: Ego Defense / Self-Esteem Maintenance.","layer_associations":[2,3]}
8
- {"id":"Loss_Aversion","name":"Loss Aversion","domain":"NEED_TO_ACT_FAST","subcategory":"Motivation_and_Commitment_Loss_Aversion","category":"NEGOTIATION_VALUE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to prefer avoiding losses to acquiring equivalent gains. The pain of losing $100 is psychologically about twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining $100.","mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","core_pattern":"Tendency to prefer avoiding losses rather than acquiring equivalent gains (pain of losing is psychologically twice as powerful as pleasure of gaining)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative emphasizes potential losses more than equivalent gains. Consider both sides of the equation and the actual probabilities.","observable_markers":["I can't lose","I'll lose everything","I have to keep","I can't give up","I'm afraid to lose"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Endowment_Effect","Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","Status_Quo_Bias"],"related_heuristics":["Prospect_Theory","Loss_Aversion"],"examples":["I won't sell my stock because I might lose money","I'd rather not risk losing $100 than gain $100"],"research_notes":"Core principle of Prospect Theory. Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses.","layer_associations":[3,5]}
9
- {"id":"Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","name":"Sunk Cost Fallacy","domain":"NEED_TO_ACT_FAST","subcategory":"Motivation_and_Commitment_Loss_Aversion","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The phenomenon where a person is reluctant to abandon a strategy or course of action because they have invested heavily in it, even when it is clear that abandonment would be more beneficial.","mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative emphasizes past investment over future outcomes. Consider whether continuing is truly beneficial, regardless of past costs.","observable_markers":["I've already invested","I can't quit now","I've put too much into this","I've come too far"],"synonyms":["Irrational_Escalation","Concorde_Effect","Escalation_of_Commitment"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Loss_Aversion","Irrational_Escalation"],"related_heuristics":["Prospect_Theory","Loss_Aversion"],"examples":["I'll keep watching this bad movie because I paid for it","I can't leave this job, I've been here 10 years"],"research_notes":"Concorde Effect is the political instance; Escalation involves active investment increase.","layer_associations":[3,5]}
10
- {"id":"Optimism_Bias","name":"Optimism Bias","domain":"NEED_TO_ACT_FAST","subcategory":"Ego_and_Confidence","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"A cognitive bias that causes someone to believe that they themselves are less likely to experience a negative event.","mechanism":"Anxiety_Reduction","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative expresses unrealistic optimism about personal risk. Consider statistical probabilities and prepare for potential negative outcomes.","observable_markers":["That won't happen to me","I'll be fine","It won't affect me","I'm different"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":["Pessimism_Bias"],"related_biases":["Overconfidence_Effect","Planning_Fallacy"],"related_heuristics":["Anxiety_Reduction","Self_Protection"],"examples":["I won't get cancer, that happens to other people","I won't be in a car accident"],"research_notes":"Mechanism: Self-Protection / Anxiety Reduction. Can flip to Pessimism Bias in depression.","layer_associations":[3,5]}
11
- {"id":"Pessimism_Bias","name":"Pessimism Bias","domain":"NOT_ENOUGH_MEANING","subcategory":"Temporal_Projection","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency for some people, especially those suffering from depression, to overestimate the likelihood of negative things happening to them.","mechanism":"Other","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative expresses unrealistic pessimism about outcomes. Consider that negative events may be less likely than perceived, and positive outcomes are possible.","observable_markers":["Something bad will happen","I'll probably fail","Things always go wrong for me","I expect the worst"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":["Optimism_Bias"],"related_biases":["Negativity_Bias"],"related_heuristics":["Depressive_Realism"],"examples":["I'll probably fail the exam","Something bad will happen if I try"],"research_notes":"Mechanism: Depressive Realism (in some definitions). Common in depression and anxiety.","layer_associations":[5]}
12
- {"id":"Reactive_Devaluation","name":"Reactive Devaluation","domain":"NOT_ENOUGH_MEANING","subcategory":"Value_Attribution_and_Projection","category":"NEGOTIATION_VALUE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"A cognitive bias that occurs when a proposal is devalued if it appears to originate from an antagonist.","mechanism":"Other","core_pattern":"Automatic dismissal or devaluation of a proposal simply because it originated from an adversary","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: proposal is evaluated based on source rather than merit. Consider the idea independently of who suggested it.","observable_markers":["That won't work","That's a bad idea","I don't trust that","They're just trying to","I don't like it because they suggested it"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["In_Group_Bias","Not_Invented_Here"],"related_heuristics":["Adversarial_Attribution"],"examples":["I reject their proposal because I don't like them","Their idea must be bad because they suggested it"],"research_notes":"Mechanism: Adversarial Attribution.","layer_associations":[2,7]}
13
- {"id":"Zero_Sum_Bias","name":"Zero Sum Bias","domain":"NOT_ENOUGH_MEANING","subcategory":"Numerical_and_Probability_Errors","category":"INFORMATION_PROCESSING","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"A cognitive bias towards thinking that a situation is a zero-sum game, where one person's gain would be another's loss.","mechanism":"Other","core_pattern":"Assumption that everything that benefits the other party must harm us (and vice versa); belief that interests are mutually exclusive","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative frames outcomes as binary (Win/Lose) rather than collaborative. Consider mutual gains and non-zero-sum solutions.","observable_markers":["If they get","I lose","It's either","One of us has to","Win-lose","There's not enough for both"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":["Scarcity_Mindset"],"examples":["If they win, I lose","There's only so much to go around","Their success means my failure"],"research_notes":"Mechanism: Scarcity Mindset.","layer_associations":[2,7]}
14
- {"id":"Role_Victim","name":"Role: Victim","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Confirmation_and_Belief_Maintenance","category":"NARRATIVE_ROLE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"Narrative places Self as acted upon rather than acting (passive victim role).","mechanism":"Other","core_pattern":"Narrative places Self as acted upon rather than acting (passive victim role)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative positions self as passive recipient. Consider active choices and agency in the situation.","observable_markers":["This was done to me","I had no choice","I was forced","They did this to me","I couldn't","I'm a victim"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Attribution_of_Blame"],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":["I had no choice but to do that","They made me do it","I'm powerless in this situation"],"research_notes":"Narrative role pattern indicating passive positioning.","layer_associations":[2,6]}
15
- {"id":"Role_Dragon","name":"Role: Dragon","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Confirmation_and_Belief_Maintenance","category":"NARRATIVE_ROLE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"Narrative assigns total responsibility for problems to the Other; assumes injurious intent (villain role).","mechanism":"Other","core_pattern":"Narrative assigns total responsibility for problems to the Other; assumes injurious intent (villain role)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative assigns total responsibility and assumes injurious intent. Consider multiple perspectives and shared responsibility.","observable_markers":["They did this to ruin","They're trying to","They want to","They're out to","They're deliberately","They're the problem"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Fundamental_Attribution_Error","Dehumanization"],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":["They're trying to sabotage me","They did this on purpose to hurt me","They're the enemy"],"research_notes":"Narrative role pattern indicating villain attribution.","layer_associations":[2,7]}
16
- {"id":"Role_Prince","name":"Role: Prince","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Confirmation_and_Belief_Maintenance","category":"NARRATIVE_ROLE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"Narrative looks for external salvation or simplistic solutions (rescuer role).","mechanism":"Other","core_pattern":"Narrative looks for external salvation or simplistic solutions (rescuer role)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative seeks external solutions. Consider internal agency and incremental change.","observable_markers":["If only","Everything would be fixed","All we need is","Just","Simply","Someone will save us"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Optimism_Bias","Illusion_of_Control"],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":["If only the government would fix this","All we need is a hero","Someone will come and save us"],"research_notes":"Narrative role pattern indicating external solution seeking.","layer_associations":[2,3]}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {"id":"Above_Average_Effect","name":"Above Average Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"All refer to overestimating one's qualities relative to others.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Illusory_Superiority","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
2
+ {"id":"Actor_Observer_Bias","name":"Actor Observer Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Errors in assigning cause to behavior.","parent_mechanism":"Attribution_Theory","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
3
+ {"id":"Ambiguity_Aversion","name":"Ambiguity Aversion","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to avoiding options with unknown probabilities.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Ambiguity_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
4
+ {"id":"Ambiguity_Effect","name":"Ambiguity Effect","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Ambiguity_Aversion"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to avoiding options with unknown probabilities.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
5
+ {"id":"Anchoring_Bias","name":"Anchoring Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Estimating values by adjusting from a starting point.","parent_mechanism":"Anchoring_Adjustment","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Focalism"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to over-reliance on initial information.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
6
+ {"id":"Anecdotal_Fallacy","name":"Anecdotal Fallacy","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by ease of recall.","parent_mechanism":"Availability_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
7
+ {"id":"Asymmetric_Dominance_Effect","name":"Asymmetric Dominance Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Asymmetric Dominance is the technical economic term.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Decoy_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
8
+ {"id":"Attentional_Bias","name":"Attentional Bias","source":"definition","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Primacy_of_Availability_and_Repetition","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency for an individual's perception to be affected by their recurring thoughts at the time. We pay attention to what we are already thinking about, creating a feedback loop of salience.","mechanism":"Other","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: attention is focused on specific themes. Consider whether this focus is helpful or creating a feedback loop.","observable_markers":["I keep noticing","I can't stop thinking about","Everything reminds me of"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Frequency_Illusion"],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":["When I'm anxious, I notice every potential threat","After buying a car, I see that model everywhere"],"research_notes":"Critical in modeling addiction or anxiety, where cues related to the condition become hyper-salient.","layer_associations":[2,5],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
9
+ {"id":"Attraction_Effect","name":"Attraction Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Asymmetric Dominance is the technical economic term.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Decoy_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
10
+ {"id":"Authority_Bias","name":"Authority Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Assuming the group/leader is correct.","parent_mechanism":"Social_Proof_Compliance","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
11
+ {"id":"Availability_Bias","name":"Availability Bias","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Recency is purely temporal; Availability includes emotional vividness.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Availability_Heuristic","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
12
+ {"id":"Availability_Heuristic","name":"Availability Heuristic","source":"definition","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Primacy_of_Availability_and_Repetition","category":"INFORMATION_PROCESSING","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to overestimate the likelihood of events based on the ease with which examples come to mind. If an instance is readily retrieved—due to recency, vividness, or emotional impact—it is judged as frequent and probable.","mechanism":"Availability_Heuristic","parent_mechanism":"Availability_Heuristic","core_pattern":"Relying on immediate examples that come to mind (often emotionally charged or recent) rather than comprehensive data","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative universalizes a specific, recent, or emotional event. Consider broader context and statistical data.","observable_markers":["You always","This always happens","Every time","It's like that time","I remember when"],"synonyms":["Availability_Bias","Recency_Bias","Vividness_Effect"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Survivorship_Bias","Recency_Effect","Primacy_Effect","Anecdotal_Fallacy"],"related_heuristics":["Availability_Heuristic"],"examples":["After seeing a plane crash on TV, I'm afraid to fly","I remember that one time it rained, so it must rain often"],"research_notes":"Causes skew in risk assessment (e.g., fearing plane crashes more than car accidents). Triggered by vivid media, recent trauma, high emotional valence.","layer_associations":[5,6],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
13
+ {"id":"Baader_Meinhof_Phenomenon","name":"Baader Meinhof Phenomenon","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to seeing something everywhere after first noticing it.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Frequency_Illusion","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
14
+ {"id":"Bandwagon_Effect","name":"Bandwagon Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Assuming the group/leader is correct.","parent_mechanism":"Social_Proof_Compliance","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Herd_Behavior","Groupthink"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Bandwagon is adoption based on popularity; Groupthink is consensus seeking at the cost of quality.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
15
+ {"id":"Base_Rate_Fallacy","name":"Base Rate Fallacy","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by ease of recall.","parent_mechanism":"Availability_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
16
+ {"id":"Base_Rate_Neglect","name":"Base Rate Neglect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by similarity to a prototype.","parent_mechanism":"Representativeness_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
17
+ {"id":"Ben_Franklin_Effect","name":"Ben Franklin Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Discomfort from conflicting beliefs/actions.","parent_mechanism":"Cognitive_Dissonance","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
18
+ {"id":"Bikeshedding","name":"Bikeshedding","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Law_of_Triviality"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to disproportionate focus on trivial issues.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
19
+ {"id":"Bizarreness_Effect","name":"Bizarreness Effect","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Von_Restorff_Effect","Isolation_Effect"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Von Restorff usually refers to lists; Bizarreness to narrative content.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
20
+ {"id":"Cherry_Picking","name":"Cherry Picking","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Myside is argumentative; Congruence is scientific testing; Cherry Picking is data selection.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Confirmation_Bias","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
21
+ {"id":"Choice_Supportive_Bias","name":"Choice Supportive Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Discomfort from conflicting beliefs/actions.","parent_mechanism":"Cognitive_Dissonance","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
22
+ {"id":"Clustering_Illusion","name":"Clustering Illusion","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Detecting patterns, even when none exist.","parent_mechanism":"Pattern_Recognition","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
23
+ {"id":"Concorde_Effect","name":"Concorde Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Concorde Effect is the political instance; Escalation involves active investment increase.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
24
+ {"id":"Confirmation_Bias","name":"Confirmation Bias","source":"definition","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Confirmation_and_Belief_Maintenance","category":"INFORMATION_PROCESSING","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.","mechanism":"Cognitive_Dissonance","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"Tendency to search for, interpret, and recall information that confirms preexisting beliefs","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative focuses on data that supports the core story. Consider alternative interpretations and contradictory evidence.","observable_markers":["That's exactly what I thought","This proves","As I suspected","I knew it","See, I told you"],"synonyms":["Myside_Bias","Congruence_Bias","Cherry_Picking"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Selective_Perception","Backfire_Effect"],"related_heuristics":["Cognitive_Dissonance"],"examples":["I only notice evidence that supports my view","I interpret ambiguous information in favor of my beliefs"],"research_notes":"Sub-types: Biased Search, Biased Interpretation, Biased Recall. Unlike Desirability Bias (believing what we want to be true), Confirmation Bias supports what we already believe, even if it is negative.","layer_associations":[5,6],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
25
+ {"id":"Conformity_Bias","name":"Conformity Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Assuming the group/leader is correct.","parent_mechanism":"Social_Proof_Compliance","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
26
+ {"id":"Congruence_Bias","name":"Congruence Bias","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Myside is argumentative; Congruence is scientific testing; Cherry Picking is data selection.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Confirmation_Bias","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
27
+ {"id":"Conjunction_Fallacy","name":"Conjunction Fallacy","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by similarity to a prototype.","parent_mechanism":"Representativeness_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
28
+ {"id":"Conservatism_Bayesian","name":"Conservatism Bayesian","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Estimating values by adjusting from a starting point.","parent_mechanism":"Anchoring_Adjustment","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
29
+ {"id":"Correspondence_Bias","name":"Correspondence Bias","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Correspondence Bias assumes behavior matches personality; FAE is the general error.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Fundamental_Attribution_Error","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
30
+ {"id":"Decoy_Effect","name":"Decoy Effect","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Asymmetric_Dominance_Effect","Attraction_Effect"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Asymmetric Dominance is the technical economic term.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
31
+ {"id":"Disposition_Effect","name":"Disposition Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses.","parent_mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
32
+ {"id":"Dunning_Kruger_Effect","name":"Dunning Kruger Effect","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Illusory_Superiority","Overconfidence"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"DK specifically links low ability to high confidence; Illusory Superiority is general.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
33
+ {"id":"Effort_Justification","name":"Effort Justification","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Discomfort from conflicting beliefs/actions.","parent_mechanism":"Cognitive_Dissonance","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"IKEA_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
34
+ {"id":"Egocentric_Bias","name":"Egocentric Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Processing information through self-referential lens.","parent_mechanism":"Ego_Centric_Processing","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
35
+ {"id":"Empathy_Gap","name":"Empathy Gap","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Hot_Cold_Empathy_Gap"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to underestimating influence of visceral drives.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
36
+ {"id":"Endowment_Effect","name":"Endowment Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses.","parent_mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
37
+ {"id":"Escalation_of_Commitment","name":"Escalation of Commitment","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Concorde Effect is the political instance; Escalation involves active investment increase.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
38
+ {"id":"Essentialism","name":"Essentialism","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Using categories to simplify complex information.","parent_mechanism":"Categorization_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
39
+ {"id":"Experimenters_Bias","name":"Experimenters Bias","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to researcher bias influencing participants.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Observer_Expectancy_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
40
+ {"id":"Fading_Affect_Bias","name":"Fading Affect Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Managing emotional states influences memory and judgment.","parent_mechanism":"Emotion_Regulation","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
41
+ {"id":"False_Consensus_Effect","name":"False Consensus Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Processing information through self-referential lens.","parent_mechanism":"Ego_Centric_Processing","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Projection_Bias"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"False Consensus is assuming others agree; Projection is assuming future self agrees.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
42
+ {"id":"Familiarity_Principle","name":"Familiarity Principle","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to preference for familiar things.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Mere_Exposure_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
43
+ {"id":"Focalism","name":"Focalism","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to over-reliance on initial information.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Anchoring_Bias","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
44
+ {"id":"Framing_Effect","name":"Framing Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses.","parent_mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
45
+ {"id":"Frequency_Illusion","name":"Frequency Illusion","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Baader_Meinhof_Phenomenon"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to seeing something everywhere after first noticing it.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
46
+ {"id":"Fundamental_Attribution_Error","name":"Fundamental Attribution Error","source":"definition","domain":"NOT_ENOUGH_MEANING","subcategory":"Mental_Modeling_of_Others","category":"PERCEPTION_ATTRIBUTION","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency for people to under-emphasize situational explanations for an individual's observed behavior while over-emphasizing dispositional and personality-based explanations.","mechanism":"Attribution_Theory","parent_mechanism":"Attribution_Theory","core_pattern":"Attributes other's behavior to character (internal) while attributing own behavior to situation (external)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative attributes outcome to personality rather than context. Consider situational factors and external circumstances.","observable_markers":["He is just","She's always","They never","He's a","She's such a","That's just how they are"],"synonyms":["Correspondence_Bias","Overattribution_Effect"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Actor_Observer_Bias","Ultimate_Attribution_Error"],"related_heuristics":["Attribution_Theory"],"examples":["He's late because he's lazy","She failed because she's not smart","They're rude because they're a bad person"],"research_notes":"Correspondence Bias assumes behavior matches personality; FAE is the general error.","layer_associations":[2,7],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
47
+ {"id":"Gamblers_Fallacy","name":"Gamblers Fallacy","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by similarity to a prototype.","parent_mechanism":"Representativeness_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Monte_Carlo_Fallacy"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to misconception of chance in independent events.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Hot_Hand_Fallacy","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Perception of Agency: Random (Gambler's) vs. Skill-based (Hot Hand)"}
48
+ {"id":"Golden_Hammer","name":"Golden Hammer","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"All refer to over-reliance on familiar tools.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Law_of_the_Instrument","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
49
+ {"id":"Group_Attribution_Error","name":"Group Attribution Error","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Errors in assigning cause to behavior.","parent_mechanism":"Attribution_Theory","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
50
+ {"id":"Groupthink","name":"Groupthink","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Assuming the group/leader is correct.","parent_mechanism":"Social_Proof_Compliance","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Bandwagon_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
51
+ {"id":"Halo_Effect","name":"Halo Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging decision by emotional 'tag' or gut feeling.","parent_mechanism":"Affect_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Physical_Attractiveness_Stereotype"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Halo Effect is broader; Physical Attractiveness Stereotype is a specific instance.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Horns_Effect","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Valence: Initial impression positive vs. negative"}
52
+ {"id":"Hard_Easy_Effect","name":"Hard Easy Effect","source":"antonym","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Easy tasks → Underconfidence; Hard tasks → Overconfidence","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Overconfidence_Effect","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Task Difficulty: Overconfident on hard tasks, underconfident on easy tasks"}
53
+ {"id":"Herd_Behavior","name":"Herd Behavior","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Bandwagon is adoption based on popularity; Groupthink is consensus seeking at the cost of quality.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Bandwagon_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
54
+ {"id":"Horns_Effect","name":"Horns Effect","source":"antonym","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Negative initial impression → Horns Effect; Positive initial impression → Halo Effect","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Halo_Effect","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Valence: Initial impression positive vs. negative"}
55
+ {"id":"Hot_Cold_Empathy_Gap","name":"Hot Cold Empathy Gap","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to underestimating influence of visceral drives.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Empathy_Gap","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
56
+ {"id":"Hot_Hand_Fallacy","name":"Hot Hand Fallacy","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by similarity to a prototype.","parent_mechanism":"Representativeness_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Gamblers_Fallacy","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Perception of Agency: Random (Gambler's) vs. Skill-based (Hot Hand)"}
57
+ {"id":"Hyperbolic_Discounting","name":"Hyperbolic Discounting","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Present_Bias","Time_Inconsistency"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Hyperbolic describes the mathematical curve; Present Bias is the behavioral result.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
58
+ {"id":"Identifiable_Victim_Effect","name":"Identifiable Victim Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging decision by emotional 'tag' or gut feeling.","parent_mechanism":"Affect_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
59
+ {"id":"IKEA_Effect","name":"IKEA Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Discomfort from conflicting beliefs/actions.","parent_mechanism":"Cognitive_Dissonance","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Effort_Justification"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"IKEA is specific to creation/assembly of products.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
60
+ {"id":"Illusion_of_Transparency","name":"Illusion of Transparency","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Estimating values by adjusting from a starting point.","parent_mechanism":"Anchoring_Adjustment","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Spotlight_Effect","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Focus: External/Behavioral vs. Internal/Mental state"}
61
+ {"id":"Illusory_Superiority","name":"Illusory Superiority","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Maintaining positive self-image.","parent_mechanism":"Self_Enhancement","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Above_Average_Effect","Superiority_Bias"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"All refer to overestimating one's qualities relative to others.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Dunning_Kruger_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
62
+ {"id":"Illusory_Truth_Effect","name":"Illusory Truth Effect","source":"definition","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Primacy_of_Availability_and_Repetition","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to believe false information to be correct after repeated exposure. Repetition increases processing fluency, which the brain misinterprets as a signal of truthfulness.","mechanism":"Processing_Fluency","parent_mechanism":"Processing_Fluency","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: belief may be based on repetition rather than evidence. Consider verifying the source and facts.","observable_markers":["I've heard that before","Everyone says","It's common knowledge","They keep saying"],"synonyms":["Truth_Effect","Reiteration_Effect"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Mere_Exposure_Effect"],"related_heuristics":["Processing_Fluency"],"examples":["After hearing a claim multiple times, I believe it's true","Repeated exposure to misinformation makes it seem credible"],"research_notes":"A foundational mechanism for the spread of misinformation and propaganda.","layer_associations":[5,6,7],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
63
+ {"id":"Impostor_Syndrome","name":"Impostor Syndrome","source":"antonym","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Low self-esteem → Impostor Syndrome; High self-esteem → Self-Serving Bias","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Self_Serving_Bias","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Self-Esteem: Low self-esteem vs. High self-esteem"}
64
+ {"id":"In_Group_Bias","name":"In Group Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging decision by emotional 'tag' or gut feeling.","parent_mechanism":"Affect_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
65
+ {"id":"Insensitivity_to_Sample_Size","name":"Insensitivity to Sample Size","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by similarity to a prototype.","parent_mechanism":"Representativeness_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
66
+ {"id":"Irrational_Escalation","name":"Irrational Escalation","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Concorde Effect is the political instance; Escalation involves active investment increase.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
67
+ {"id":"Isolation_Effect","name":"Isolation Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Von Restorff usually refers to lists; Bizarreness to narrative content.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Bizarreness_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
68
+ {"id":"Just_World_Hypothesis","name":"Just World Hypothesis","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Reducing anxiety through cognitive strategies.","parent_mechanism":"Anxiety_Reduction","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
69
+ {"id":"Lake_Wobegon_Effect","name":"Lake Wobegon Effect","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Illusory_Superiority"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Lake Wobegon is a specific instance of illusory superiority.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
70
+ {"id":"Law_of_the_Instrument","name":"Law of the Instrument","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Maslows_Hammer","Golden_Hammer"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"All refer to over-reliance on familiar tools.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
71
+ {"id":"Law_of_Triviality","name":"Law of Triviality","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to disproportionate focus on trivial issues.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Bikeshedding","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
72
+ {"id":"Loss_Aversion","name":"Loss Aversion","source":"definition","domain":"NEED_TO_ACT_FAST","subcategory":"Motivation_and_Commitment_Loss_Aversion","category":"NEGOTIATION_VALUE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to prefer avoiding losses to acquiring equivalent gains. The pain of losing $100 is psychologically about twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining $100.","mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","parent_mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","core_pattern":"Tendency to prefer avoiding losses rather than acquiring equivalent gains (pain of losing is psychologically twice as powerful as pleasure of gaining)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative emphasizes potential losses more than equivalent gains. Consider both sides of the equation and the actual probabilities.","observable_markers":["I can't lose","I'll lose everything","I have to keep","I can't give up","I'm afraid to lose"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Endowment_Effect","Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","Status_Quo_Bias"],"related_heuristics":["Prospect_Theory","Loss_Aversion"],"examples":["I won't sell my stock because I might lose money","I'd rather not risk losing $100 than gain $100"],"research_notes":"Core principle of Prospect Theory. Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses.","layer_associations":[3,5],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
73
+ {"id":"Maslows_Hammer","name":"Maslows Hammer","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"All refer to over-reliance on familiar tools.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Law_of_the_Instrument","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
74
+ {"id":"Mental_Accounting","name":"Mental Accounting","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Using categories to simplify complex information.","parent_mechanism":"Categorization_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
75
+ {"id":"Mere_Exposure_Effect","name":"Mere Exposure Effect","source":"definition","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Primacy_of_Availability_and_Repetition","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The psychological phenomenon by which people tend to develop a preference for things merely because they are familiar with them. In evolutionary terms, 'familiar' implies 'safe'.","mechanism":"Familiarity_Heuristic","parent_mechanism":"Familiarity_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: preference may be based on familiarity rather than quality. Consider evaluating options objectively.","observable_markers":["I prefer","It's familiar","I know this","I've seen this before"],"synonyms":["Familiarity_Principle"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Illusory_Truth_Effect"],"related_heuristics":["Familiarity_Heuristic"],"examples":["I prefer brands I've seen advertised","Familiar faces seem more trustworthy"],"research_notes":"Application: Brand recognition and advertising optimization.","layer_associations":[2,7],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
76
+ {"id":"Monte_Carlo_Fallacy","name":"Monte Carlo Fallacy","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to misconception of chance in independent events.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Gamblers_Fallacy","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
77
+ {"id":"Mood_Congruent_Memory_Bias","name":"Mood Congruent Memory Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Managing emotional states influences memory and judgment.","parent_mechanism":"Emotion_Regulation","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
78
+ {"id":"Myside_Bias","name":"Myside Bias","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Myside is argumentative; Congruence is scientific testing; Cherry Picking is data selection.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Confirmation_Bias","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
79
+ {"id":"Negativity_Bias","name":"Negativity Bias","source":"antonym","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Threat-focused → Negativity Bias; Emotion regulation → Positivity Effect","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Positivity_Effect","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Emotional State: Threat detection vs. Emotion regulation"}
80
+ {"id":"Neglect_of_Probability","name":"Neglect of Probability","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging decision by emotional 'tag' or gut feeling.","parent_mechanism":"Affect_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
81
+ {"id":"Neophilia","name":"Neophilia","source":"antonym","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Low openness → Status Quo Bias; High openness → Neophilia","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Status_Quo_Bias","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Personality Trait: Openness to Experience (Big Five)"}
82
+ {"id":"Observer_Expectancy_Effect","name":"Observer Expectancy Effect","source":"synonym_primary","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":["Experimenters_Bias"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Both refer to researcher bias influencing participants.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
83
+ {"id":"Optimism_Bias","name":"Optimism Bias","source":"definition","domain":"NEED_TO_ACT_FAST","subcategory":"Ego_and_Confidence","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"A cognitive bias that causes someone to believe that they themselves are less likely to experience a negative event.","mechanism":"Anxiety_Reduction","parent_mechanism":"Anxiety_Reduction","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative expresses unrealistic optimism about personal risk. Consider statistical probabilities and prepare for potential negative outcomes.","observable_markers":["That won't happen to me","I'll be fine","It won't affect me","I'm different"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":["Pessimism_Bias"],"related_biases":["Overconfidence_Effect","Planning_Fallacy"],"related_heuristics":["Anxiety_Reduction","Self_Protection"],"examples":["I won't get cancer, that happens to other people","I won't be in a car accident"],"research_notes":"Mechanism: Self-Protection / Anxiety Reduction. Can flip to Pessimism Bias in depression.","layer_associations":[3,5],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Pessimism_Bias","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Emotional State: Depression/Anxiety levels (Depressive Realism)"}
84
+ {"id":"Ostrich_Effect","name":"Ostrich Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Reducing anxiety through cognitive strategies.","parent_mechanism":"Anxiety_Reduction","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
85
+ {"id":"Out_Group_Homogeneity","name":"Out Group Homogeneity","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging decision by emotional 'tag' or gut feeling.","parent_mechanism":"Affect_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
86
+ {"id":"Overattribution_Effect","name":"Overattribution Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Correspondence Bias assumes behavior matches personality; FAE is the general error.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Fundamental_Attribution_Error","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
87
+ {"id":"Overconfidence","name":"Overconfidence","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"DK specifically links low ability to high confidence; Illusory Superiority is general.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Dunning_Kruger_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
88
+ {"id":"Overconfidence_Effect","name":"Overconfidence Effect","source":"antonym","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Hard tasks → Overconfidence; Easy tasks → Underconfidence (Hard-Easy Effect)","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Hard_Easy_Effect","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Task Difficulty: Overconfident on hard tasks, underconfident on easy tasks"}
89
+ {"id":"Pareidolia","name":"Pareidolia","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Detecting patterns, even when none exist.","parent_mechanism":"Pattern_Recognition","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
90
+ {"id":"Pessimism_Bias","name":"Pessimism Bias","source":"definition","domain":"NOT_ENOUGH_MEANING","subcategory":"Temporal_Projection","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency for some people, especially those suffering from depression, to overestimate the likelihood of negative things happening to them.","mechanism":"Other","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative expresses unrealistic pessimism about outcomes. Consider that negative events may be less likely than perceived, and positive outcomes are possible.","observable_markers":["Something bad will happen","I'll probably fail","Things always go wrong for me","I expect the worst"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":["Optimism_Bias"],"related_biases":["Negativity_Bias"],"related_heuristics":["Depressive_Realism"],"examples":["I'll probably fail the exam","Something bad will happen if I try"],"research_notes":"Mechanism: Depressive Realism (in some definitions). Common in depression and anxiety.","layer_associations":[5],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Optimism_Bias","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Emotional State: Low depression/anxiety, positive mood"}
91
+ {"id":"Physical_Attractiveness_Stereotype","name":"Physical Attractiveness Stereotype","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Halo Effect is broader; Physical Attractiveness Stereotype is a specific instance.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Halo_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
92
+ {"id":"Planning_Fallacy","name":"Planning Fallacy","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Estimating values by adjusting from a starting point.","parent_mechanism":"Anchoring_Adjustment","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
93
+ {"id":"Positivity_Effect","name":"Positivity Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Managing emotional states influences memory and judgment.","parent_mechanism":"Emotion_Regulation","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Negativity_Bias","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Emotional State: Threat detection vs. Emotion regulation"}
94
+ {"id":"Post_Purchase_Rationalization","name":"Post Purchase Rationalization","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Discomfort from conflicting beliefs/actions.","parent_mechanism":"Cognitive_Dissonance","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
95
+ {"id":"Present_Bias","name":"Present Bias","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Hyperbolic describes the mathematical curve; Present Bias is the behavioral result.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Hyperbolic_Discounting","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
96
+ {"id":"Primacy_Effect","name":"Primacy Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by ease of recall.","parent_mechanism":"Availability_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
97
+ {"id":"Projection_Bias","name":"Projection Bias","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"False Consensus is assuming others agree; Projection is assuming future self agrees.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"False_Consensus_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
98
+ {"id":"Reactive_Devaluation","name":"Reactive Devaluation","source":"definition","domain":"NOT_ENOUGH_MEANING","subcategory":"Value_Attribution_and_Projection","category":"NEGOTIATION_VALUE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"A cognitive bias that occurs when a proposal is devalued if it appears to originate from an antagonist.","mechanism":"Other","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"Automatic dismissal or devaluation of a proposal simply because it originated from an adversary","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: proposal is evaluated based on source rather than merit. Consider the idea independently of who suggested it.","observable_markers":["That won't work","That's a bad idea","I don't trust that","They're just trying to","I don't like it because they suggested it"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["In_Group_Bias","Not_Invented_Here"],"related_heuristics":["Adversarial_Attribution"],"examples":["I reject their proposal because I don't like them","Their idea must be bad because they suggested it"],"research_notes":"Mechanism: Adversarial Attribution.","layer_associations":[2,7],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
99
+ {"id":"Recency_Bias","name":"Recency Bias","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Recency is purely temporal; Availability includes emotional vividness.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Availability_Heuristic","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
100
+ {"id":"Recency_Effect","name":"Recency Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by ease of recall.","parent_mechanism":"Availability_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
101
+ {"id":"Reiteration_Effect","name":"Reiteration Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"All refer to the same phenomenon of repetition increasing perceived truthfulness.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Illusory_Truth_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
102
+ {"id":"Rhyme_as_Reason_Effect","name":"Rhyme as Reason Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Ease of processing information influences judgments.","parent_mechanism":"Processing_Fluency","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
103
+ {"id":"Role_Dragon","name":"Role: Dragon","source":"definition","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Confirmation_and_Belief_Maintenance","category":"NARRATIVE_ROLE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"Narrative assigns total responsibility for problems to the Other; assumes injurious intent (villain role).","mechanism":"Other","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"Narrative assigns total responsibility for problems to the Other; assumes injurious intent (villain role)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative assigns total responsibility and assumes injurious intent. Consider multiple perspectives and shared responsibility.","observable_markers":["They did this to ruin","They're trying to","They want to","They're out to","They're deliberately","They're the problem"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Fundamental_Attribution_Error","Dehumanization"],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":["They're trying to sabotage me","They did this on purpose to hurt me","They're the enemy"],"research_notes":"Narrative role pattern indicating villain attribution.","layer_associations":[2,7],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
104
+ {"id":"Role_Prince","name":"Role: Prince","source":"definition","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Confirmation_and_Belief_Maintenance","category":"NARRATIVE_ROLE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"Narrative looks for external salvation or simplistic solutions (rescuer role).","mechanism":"Other","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"Narrative looks for external salvation or simplistic solutions (rescuer role)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative seeks external solutions. Consider internal agency and incremental change.","observable_markers":["If only","Everything would be fixed","All we need is","Just","Simply","Someone will save us"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Optimism_Bias","Illusion_of_Control"],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":["If only the government would fix this","All we need is a hero","Someone will come and save us"],"research_notes":"Narrative role pattern indicating external solution seeking.","layer_associations":[2,3],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
105
+ {"id":"Role_Victim","name":"Role: Victim","source":"definition","domain":"TOO_MUCH_INFO","subcategory":"Confirmation_and_Belief_Maintenance","category":"NARRATIVE_ROLE","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"Narrative places Self as acted upon rather than acting (passive victim role).","mechanism":"Other","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"Narrative places Self as acted upon rather than acting (passive victim role)","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative positions self as passive recipient. Consider active choices and agency in the situation.","observable_markers":["This was done to me","I had no choice","I was forced","They did this to me","I couldn't","I'm a victim"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Attribution_of_Blame"],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":["I had no choice but to do that","They made me do it","I'm powerless in this situation"],"research_notes":"Narrative role pattern indicating passive positioning.","layer_associations":[2,6],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
106
+ {"id":"Self_Relevance_Effect","name":"Self Relevance Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Processing information through self-referential lens.","parent_mechanism":"Ego_Centric_Processing","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
107
+ {"id":"Self_Serving_Bias","name":"Self-Serving Bias","source":"definition","domain":"NEED_TO_ACT_FAST","subcategory":"Ego_and_Confidence","category":"PERCEPTION_ATTRIBUTION","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The tendency to perceive oneself in an overly favorable manner. Specifically, attributing success to internal factors (skill) and failure to external factors (luck/situation).","mechanism":"Self_Enhancement","parent_mechanism":"Attribution_Theory","core_pattern":"Tendency to claim more credit for success than is due, or to see oneself as central to events","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative emphasizes personal agency in positive outcomes. Consider collaborative contributions and external factors in both success and failure.","observable_markers":["I made it happen","It was all because of me","I was the one who","Without me","I succeeded because I'm skilled","I failed because of bad luck"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":["Impostor_Syndrome"],"related_biases":["Actor_Observer_Bias","Illusory_Superiority"],"related_heuristics":["Self_Enhancement","Attribution_Theory"],"examples":["I got the promotion because I'm talented","I lost because the conditions were unfair"],"research_notes":"Antonym: Depressive Realism. Mechanism: Ego Defense / Self-Esteem Maintenance.","layer_associations":[2,3],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Impostor_Syndrome","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Self-Esteem: High self-esteem vs. Low self-esteem"}
108
+ {"id":"Spotlight_Effect","name":"Spotlight Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Estimating values by adjusting from a starting point.","parent_mechanism":"Anchoring_Adjustment","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Illusion_of_Transparency","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Focus: External/Behavioral vs. Internal/Mental state"}
109
+ {"id":"Status_Quo_Bias","name":"Status Quo Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses.","parent_mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"Neophilia","antonym_flipping_mechanism":"Personality Trait: Openness to Experience (Big Five)"}
110
+ {"id":"Stereotyping","name":"Stereotyping","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by similarity to a prototype.","parent_mechanism":"Representativeness_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
111
+ {"id":"Sunk_Cost_Fallacy","name":"Sunk Cost Fallacy","source":"definition","domain":"NEED_TO_ACT_FAST","subcategory":"Motivation_and_Commitment_Loss_Aversion","category":"","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"The phenomenon where a person is reluctant to abandon a strategy or course of action because they have invested heavily in it, even when it is clear that abandonment would be more beneficial.","mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","parent_mechanism":"Prospect_Theory","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative emphasizes past investment over future outcomes. Consider whether continuing is truly beneficial, regardless of past costs.","observable_markers":["I've already invested","I can't quit now","I've put too much into this","I've come too far"],"synonyms":["Irrational_Escalation","Concorde_Effect","Escalation_of_Commitment"],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":["Loss_Aversion","Irrational_Escalation"],"related_heuristics":["Prospect_Theory","Loss_Aversion"],"examples":["I'll keep watching this bad movie because I paid for it","I can't leave this job, I've been here 10 years"],"research_notes":"Concorde Effect is the political instance; Escalation involves active investment increase.","layer_associations":[3,5],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
112
+ {"id":"Superiority_Bias","name":"Superiority Bias","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"All refer to overestimating one's qualities relative to others.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Illusory_Superiority","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
113
+ {"id":"Survivorship_Bias","name":"Survivorship Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging probability by ease of recall.","parent_mechanism":"Availability_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
114
+ {"id":"System_Justification","name":"System Justification","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Reducing anxiety through cognitive strategies.","parent_mechanism":"Anxiety_Reduction","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
115
+ {"id":"Third_Person_Effect","name":"Third Person Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Maintaining positive self-image.","parent_mechanism":"Self_Enhancement","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
116
+ {"id":"Time_Inconsistency","name":"Time Inconsistency","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Hyperbolic describes the mathematical curve; Present Bias is the behavioral result.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Hyperbolic_Discounting","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
117
+ {"id":"Truth_Effect","name":"Truth Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"All refer to the same phenomenon of repetition increasing perceived truthfulness.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Illusory_Truth_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
118
+ {"id":"Ultimate_Attribution_Error","name":"Ultimate Attribution Error","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Errors in assigning cause to behavior.","parent_mechanism":"Attribution_Theory","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
119
+ {"id":"Vividness_Effect","name":"Vividness Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Recency is purely temporal; Availability includes emotional vividness.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Availability_Heuristic","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
120
+ {"id":"Von_Restorff_Effect","name":"Von Restorff Effect","source":"synonym_alias","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"Von Restorff usually refers to lists; Bizarreness to narrative content.","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"Bizarreness_Effect","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
121
+ {"id":"Well_Traveled_Road_Effect","name":"Well Traveled Road Effect","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Ease of processing information influences judgments.","parent_mechanism":"Processing_Fluency","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
122
+ {"id":"Zero_Risk_Bias","name":"Zero Risk Bias","source":"mechanism_derivative","domain":"","subcategory":"","category":"","system":"","definition":"","mechanism":"Judging decision by emotional 'tag' or gut feeling.","parent_mechanism":"Affect_Heuristic","core_pattern":"","low_entropy_insight":"","observable_markers":[],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":[],"examples":[],"research_notes":"","layer_associations":[],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
123
+ {"id":"Zero_Sum_Bias","name":"Zero Sum Bias","source":"definition","domain":"NOT_ENOUGH_MEANING","subcategory":"Numerical_and_Probability_Errors","category":"INFORMATION_PROCESSING","system":"SYSTEM_1","definition":"A cognitive bias towards thinking that a situation is a zero-sum game, where one person's gain would be another's loss.","mechanism":"Other","parent_mechanism":"","core_pattern":"Assumption that everything that benefits the other party must harm us (and vice versa); belief that interests are mutually exclusive","low_entropy_insight":"Notice: narrative frames outcomes as binary (Win/Lose) rather than collaborative. Consider mutual gains and non-zero-sum solutions.","observable_markers":["If they get","I lose","It's either","One of us has to","Win-lose","There's not enough for both"],"synonyms":[],"antonyms":[],"related_biases":[],"related_heuristics":["Scarcity_Mindset"],"examples":["If they win, I lose","There's only so much to go around","Their success means my failure"],"research_notes":"Mechanism: Scarcity Mindset.","layer_associations":[2,7],"synonym_of":"","antonym_of":"","antonym_flipping_mechanism":""}
intervention_levers/train.jsonl ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {"id":"TIME","description":"Modifies the time of the task or boundary duration.","examples":["Move high-stakes choices before 1pm","Protect bedtime window"]}
2
+ {"id":"ENVIRONMENT","description":"Modifies the physical or digital setting.","examples":["Insert 10-minute sensory reset","Batch tasks by domain (context switching)"]}
3
+ {"id":"SEQUENCE","description":"Modifies the order of tasks or interactions.","examples":["Daily 30-minute loop-closure block","Move creative work before administrative tasks"]}
4
+ {"id":"SCRIPT","description":"Develops a pre-planned verbal or behavioral response.","examples":["Use a pre-rehearsed neutral script for conflict","Use scripted replies for open-loop emails"]}
5
+ {"id":"CONSTRAINT","description":"Introduces a rule to limit options or capacity.","examples":["Cap back-to-back meetings at 2","Set phone notifications to silent after 8pm"]}
6
+ {"id":"FEEDBACK_INTEGRATION","description":"Requires seeking and reviewing external perspective.","examples":["Seek honest input from trusted peer","Record objective evidence of trait impact"]}
nonverbal_cues/train.jsonl ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {"id":"EYES_BLINK_RATE_HIGH","signal":"STRESS","description":"Significant increase from baseline reliably indicates stress.","contextual_alert":"Decoy: Dry air, allergies."}
2
+ {"id":"EYE_SQUINTING_NARROWING","signal":"DISCOMFORT_DISAGREEMENT","description":"Accurate indicator of discomfort, disagreement, or negative assessment.","contextual_alert":""}
3
+ {"id":"MOUTH_LIP_CORNER_UNILATERAL","signal":"CONTEMPT_SUPERIORITY","description":"Universal micro-expression for contempt or scorn.","contextual_alert":""}
4
+ {"id":"JAW_CLENCHED","signal":"TENSION_STRESS","description":"Clear sign of tension or stress (masseter muscles bulge).","contextual_alert":""}
5
+ {"id":"SHOULDERS_TURTLE_EFFECT","signal":"INSECURITY_FEAR","description":"Shoulders rise toward ears; indicates distress, insecurity, or fear.","contextual_alert":""}
6
+ {"id":"SHRUG_ASYNCHRONOUS","signal":"INCONGRUENCE_LOW_COMMITMENT","description":"Classic sign of incongruence, signaling low confidence or commitment.","contextual_alert":""}
7
+ {"id":"ARMS_CROSSED","signal":"DEFENSIVENESS_BARRIER","description":"Barrier signal; can mean disagreement or defensiveness.","contextual_alert":"Decoy: May simply indicate the person is cold."}
8
+ {"id":"FOOT_TAPPING_CHANGE","signal":"NERVOUS_IMPULSIVITY","description":"Impatience or nervous energy; the true tell is a sudden change from baseline.","contextual_alert":""}
9
+ {"id":"VOCAL_PITCH_RISE_SUDDEN","signal":"ANXIETY_EXCITEMENT","description":"Sudden rise often signals anxiety or excitement.","contextual_alert":""}