Dataset Viewer

The dataset viewer should be available soon. Please retry later.

TCGA Tabular (Open Access)

Open-access TCGA data from the NCI Genomic Data Commons (GDC). Covers all 33 TCGA projects.

This view presents one HuggingFace subset per (project, table). See the tcga-patients-open companion for a per-row view of the same underlying data.

  • Generated: 2026-08-14 01:41:46 UTC
  • Schema: derived from the GDC Data Dictionary.
  • GDC data release: Data Release 45.0 - December 04, 2025

Data model

Where the data comes from

Three sources feed each project's data, all open-access:

  • Case-level clinical structure — fetched from the GDC /cases endpoint, returning the full nested case JSON (demographic + diagnoses → treatments + follow_ups + exposures + family_histories + samples → portions → analytes → aliquots). The biospecimen subtree on each case:

    case          one patient (TCGA-XX-1234)
    └── sample    physical specimen taken from the patient at one timepoint
                  (Primary Tumor, Solid Tissue Normal, Blood Derived Normal, ...)
        └── portion    a piece of that sample for a specific lab process
            └── analyte    extracted material of one type (DNA or RNA)
                └── aliquot    a vial of that analyte handed off for sequencing
    
  • Per-modality files — discovered via /files (filtered by the clauses in the table below) and downloaded via /data. Each combination locks one data_type to a specific GDC pipeline so a future GDC addition can't quietly substitute a different pipeline under the same data_type. This covers both the molecular modalities and the scanned Pathology Report PDFs, which are carried verbatim — no text extraction is applied, so consumers can run whichever parser they trust against the original document.

  • BCR Clinical Supplement biotabs — original Biospecimen Core Resource (BCR) clinical forms shipped as per-project TSVs (one per form: patient, follow_up, nte, drug, radiation, etc.). The harmonized /cases endpoint drops or under-populates a number of clinical fields the BCR-original biotabs preserve. The schema varies by cancer type (e.g. BLCA's BCG-response columns don't exist in CHOL's hepatic-marker forms), so each project's biotabs ship only the columns they actually carry. Discovered the same way (/files then /data) — see the filter table below.

Source data filters (canonical)

Same in both views of the dataset; each row locks the /files query for one source:

data_type data_format data_category experimental_strategy analysis.workflow_type
Masked Somatic Mutation MAF Simple Nucleotide Variation WXS Aliquot Ensemble Somatic Variant Merging and Masking
Gene Expression Quantification TSV Transcriptome Profiling RNA-Seq STAR - Counts
Pathology Report PDF Clinical `` ``
miRNA Expression Quantification `` Transcriptome Profiling miRNA-Seq BCGSC miRNA Profiling
Protein Expression Quantification TSV Proteome Profiling Reverse Phase Protein Array ``
Allele-specific Copy Number Segment TXT Copy Number Variation `` ``
Masked Copy Number Segment TXT Copy Number Variation `` ``
Clinical Supplement bcr biotab Clinical

How each source appears in this view

Source Where it lands
GDC /cases cases table — one row per patient with the GDC case JSON structure preserved as nested struct columns (demographic, diagnoses[], follow_ups[], samples[], ...); gdc_portal_url link added
Masked Somatic Mutation MAFs masked_somatic_mutation table — one row per variant (sample FKs resolved alongside GDC's aliquot UUIDs)
Gene Expression Quantification gene_expression_quantification table — one row per (aliquot, gene); stranded_first / stranded_second dropped (GDC harmonizes as unstranded)
BCR Clinical Supplements clinical_supplement_* tables — one per BCR form (patient, follow_up, nte, drug, radiation, ablation, omf)
Pathology Reports pathology_report table — one row per report, with the scanned PDF verbatim in pdf_bytes
Allele-specific Copy Number Segment allele_specific_copy_number_segment table — one row per segment, integer total / major / minor copy number from ASCAT2, ASCAT3 and AscatNGS (filter on workflow_type)
Masked Copy Number Segment masked_copy_number_segment table — one row per DNAcopy segment, log2 ratio in segment_mean, germline CNVs masked out
miRNA Expression Quantification mirna_expression_quantification table — one row per (aliquot, miRBase v21 mature miRNA)
Protein Expression Quantification protein_expression_quantification table — one row per (portion, antibody) RPPA measurement
BCR Biospecimen Supplements biospecimen_supplement_* tables — one per BCR form (sample, portion, analyte, aliquot, slide, protocol, ssf_*, ...)
MSigDB gene sets + RNA-Seq ssgsea_scores_* / ssgsea_stats_* tables — pathway activity per aliquot; see the ssGSEA section below
Per-modality manifests files table — one row per (file, case) with file_id / md5sum / data_type / size; useful for joining a row back to its source file or replaying a specific modality fetch

Specific to this view

  • Joining: every flat row carries case_submitter_id (and aliquot_submitter_id where applicable) for direct joins back to cases without re-resolving UUIDs.
  • Each (project, table) pair is one HuggingFace config named <project>_<table> (e.g. TCGA_LUAD_cases).
  • BCR fields in the clinical_supplement_* tables are all typed as strings, with sentinel values like [Not Available] preserved verbatim.

Provenance pinned per build

  • GET /status → data_release / tag / commit saved in each project's gdc_status.json.
  • GET /v0/submission/_dictionary/_all → schema dictionary snapshot saved alongside the raw data; its SHA-256 is recorded in gdc_status.json.

See the repository for full request payloads, filter clauses, and the build pipeline source.

Survival endpoints (survival_derived)

We have provided a supplement to the GDC source data: re-derived survival endpoints — Overall Survival (OS), Disease-Specific Survival (DSS), Progression-Free Interval (PFI), Disease-Free Interval (DFI) — following the algorithm published by Liu et al. 2018 (DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.052).

Surfaced as a standalone survival_derived table (one row per patient, joined to cases on case_submitter_id) with eight columns: os_event / os_time, dss_event / dss_time, pfi_event / pfi_time, dfi_event / dfi_time. *_event is 0/1 (event observed vs censored); *_time is days from index_date (TCGA: diagnosis date). DFI is null for SKCM / THYM / UVM / LAML — Liu specifies no DFI for those tumor types.

We've reimplemented Liu's method against the current TCGA data and find broad agreement with the original curated CDR. Differences exist and are expected: this is a newer release of the underlying GDC data, so re-curated clinical values, post-2018 patient additions, and schema migrations all contribute to the gap. This work is evolving; see the repository for the full reproduction report and per-endpoint methodology.

Why we don't ship Liu's curated 2018 values directly: the CDR is a frozen 2018 snapshot derived from a since-modified GDC release. Including those values would lock in irreproducible source-data drift. We re-derive on every build, so the values reflect the current GDC and are reproducible from this dataset's other tables alone.

Pathology reports

Scanned surgical pathology reports as GDC serves them — 11,208 reports covering 11,121 cases across 32 projects. The pathology_report table has one row per report, with the document in pdf_bytes.

TCGA-LAML has none, which is expected rather than missing: acute myeloid leukaemia has no surgical resection specimen to report on.

The bytes, not a text extraction

The PDFs are carried verbatim, with no text extraction applied. Any parse is specific to the tool and version that produced it, so extracting at publication time would freeze one tool's output into the dataset and lose the original. Shipping the source document means a better parser can be run later without re-downloading from GDC, and a canonical parse — if one is added — becomes an additional clearly-labelled column rather than a replacement.

Practical notes for anyone parsing them:

  • These are page scans. Most carry an OCR text layer added upstream of GDC, so a pure-Python extractor returns several hundred to a few thousand characters for nearly every report — but that layer transcribes the barcode strip and handwritten margin notes as noise, and its fidelity varies by submitting institution.
  • Patient identifiers are redacted out of the page image by GDC before distribution.

Joining to a sample

Every report links to the sample it describes. The GDC file name is <case_submitter_id>.<REPORT_UUID>.PDF, and that UUID is the same value GDC reports on sample.pathology_report_uuid — a key this dataset has always carried, so reports join to samples without anything new being invented. Where GDC names the sample directly in the file's associated_entities, that is preferred, with the file-name UUID as fallback.

Copy number

Copy number ships at segment level, exactly as GDC serves it, in two tables that answer different questions.

Table Caller Measurement Files
allele_specific_copy_number_segment ASCAT2, ASCAT3, AscatNGS Integer total copy number plus its split into major_copy_number / minor_copy_number 23,225
masked_copy_number_segment DNAcopy Relative log2(sample / reference) in segment_mean, germline CNVs masked out 22,629

copy_number = major_copy_number + minor_copy_number holds everywhere. minor_copy_number = 0 with major_copy_number > 0 is loss of heterozygosity.

Filter on workflow_type

All three allele-specific callers ship for overlapping aliquots, and each fits tumour purity and ploidy independently, so they can disagree. On TCGA-CHOL, ASCAT2 and ASCAT3 give the same length-weighted modal copy number for 33 of 36 shared aliquots — but where they differ they differ substantially (one aliquot is modal 2 under ASCAT2 and modal 4 under ASCAT3), and ASCAT3 segments far more coarsely (2,469 segments against ASCAT2's 6,580 over the same aliquots). AscatNGS is the WGS-based caller; the other two run on genotyping arrays, recorded in experimental_strategy.

A query that does not filter on workflow_type is pooling three different answers to the same question. ASCAT3 is GDC's current standard.

The two views are not interchangeable

Nesting each masked segment inside its containing ASCAT3 segment on TCGA-CHOL (2,590 pairs) gives Spearman +0.56, with median segment_mean rising monotonically across integer copy number:

copy_number 0 1 2 4 8
median segment_mean −1.93 −0.44 +0.07 +0.22 +1.25

The correlation is only moderate, and that is a property of the data rather than a defect: ASCAT corrects for purity and ploidy while DNAcopy's ratio is against a diploid reference, so in a hyperdiploid tumour integer copy number 3 is copy-neutral relative to its own baseline yet still reads near log2 0. Use the allele-specific calls for absolute copy number, the masked segments for reference-relative ratio.

One formatting difference is carried through from the source rather than normalized: the allele-specific segments write chr1, and the masked segments write bare 1.

A small tail of over-fragmented masked segments

Most masked files hold 60-100 segments (median 77 in TCGA-LAML, 91 in TCGA-BRCA, 67 in TCGA-CHOL). A handful hold tens of thousands: 32 of 22,629 files (0.14%) exceed 200 KB, the largest carrying 50,780 segments against TCGA-BRCA's per-file maximum of 1,029. They cluster in TCGA-LAML (12), TCGA-BLCA (9) and TCGA-BRCA (7), and the most extreme are all -11A- matched normals.

This is the signature of a noisy genotyping array, where circular binary segmentation fails to merge and emits many tiny spurious calls. It is genuine GDC content and is shipped unmodified, but it is a real trap: an unfiltered query over this table gets a few samples contributing tens of thousands of junk rows each, enough to skew any per-segment aggregate. num_probes is the filter — the spurious segments are supported by very few probes.

Gene-level copy number is deliberately absent

GDC also serves Gene Level Copy Number — the same calls projected onto GENCODE v36 — at roughly 34 GB per workflow. It is not shipped here because it is exactly reproducible from the allele-specific segments rather than being independent evidence. (Verified against GDC's own files on TCGA-CHOL: projecting segments onto the gene model reproduced every gene call with zero mismatches across three aliquots, and for genes straddling a segment boundary GDC's min_copy_number / max_copy_number are the min and max over the overlapping segments.) It may be added later as a clearly-labelled derived table.

miRNA-Seq and protein expression (RPPA)

mirna_expression_quantification

One row per (aliquot, miRBase v21 mature miRNA) — ~1,881 miRNAs per aliquot, from 11,441 files across TCGA. read_count is raw; reads_per_million_mirna_mapped is normalized within the aliquot and sums to exactly 1,000,000 per aliquot.

cross_mapped is Y when reads for that miRNA also aligned elsewhere in the genome, so its count is not uniquely attributable. GDC ships the flag rather than dropping the row and so do we; filter it out if you need clean attribution. The source column is spelled cross-mapped — renamed here only because the hyphen is not a legal bare SQL identifier.

Isoform-level quantification (Isoform Expression Quantification, ~4 GB) is not shipped.

protein_expression_quantification

Reverse Phase Protein Array. One row per (portion, antibody). 7,906 files covering 7,827 of 11,428 TCGA cases — the narrowest coverage of any modality here, because RPPA was only run on a subset.

Three things to know before using it:

  • It is the only modality that attaches to a portion, not an aliquot, so it carries portion_id and resolves sample_id through the portion.
  • The antibody panel grew over the project's life, and set_id records which version a measurement came from. A peptide_target absent for a sample may mean "not on that panel" rather than "measured as zero".
  • protein_expression is null where the source says NA — a failed or missing measurement, not a zero. On TCGA-CHOL that is 930 of 14,370 cells (6.5%).

Values are replicate-based normalized log2 signal, centred near 0, and the sign is meaningful. Agreement with matched RNA is modest and positive, as expected for protein-vs-transcript: median Spearman +0.26 across shared targets on TCGA-CHOL.

Biospecimen supplements

The counterpart to clinical_supplement_*: where those describe the patient, biospecimen_supplement_* describes the specimen chain — how a tumour got from the operating room to a sequencer, and the pathologist's read on each slide along the way. 340 BCR biotab files across TCGA (~76 MB) covering 11,315 cases, one table per form.

Some of it restates what the case structure already nests (sample / portion / analyte / aliquot ids and types). The forms worth reaching for are the ones with no /cases equivalent:

Table What is in it
biospecimen_supplement_slide Per-slide percent_tumor_nuclei, percent_necrosis, percent_stromal_cells, percent_lymphocyte_infiltration, section_location — the QC layer behind "is this sample actually tumour?", and the standard covariate for purity and deconvolution work
biospecimen_supplement_analyte a260_a280_ratio, concentration, extraction method — nucleic-acid quality, which drives batch effects
biospecimen_supplement_protocol, biospecimen_supplement_shipment_portion Plate, shipment and centre each specimen moved through — the raw material for batch-effect analysis
biospecimen_supplement_ssf_tumor_samples, biospecimen_supplement_ssf_normal_controls Site-specific factors: the disease-specific pathology fields the pan-cancer clinical schema has no column for
biospecimen_supplement_cqcf The submitting centre's clinical quality control form (TCGA-LUAD only)

Like the clinical supplements these are flex-schema: the column set differs by project and by submitting centre, so the shape is inferred per project rather than padded into a pan-cancer union. Forms with no data for a project are omitted entirely (only TCGA-LUAD has cqcf; only 9 projects have auxiliary). All fields are typed as strings with BCR sentinels like [Not Available] preserved verbatim.

Records are keyed to the patient by BCR barcode. The specimen-level forms are keyed on their own entity and several omit the patient barcode column entirely, in which case it is recovered as the first three groups of the entity barcode (TCGA-3X-AAV9-01A-11D-A42S-01 → TCGA-3X-AAV9) — a property of the TCGA barcode grammar, not a heuristic.

Two submitters ship these files: nationwidechildrens.org for 334 of the 340, and genome.wustl.edu for 6 (all TCGA-LUAD). Where both ship the same form for one project their records are concatenated, and the parquet schema is the union of their columns.

Pathway activity (ssGSEA)

Single-sample gene set enrichment scores for every RNA-Seq aliquot, one ssgsea_scores_<collection> table per MSigDB collection plus a matching ssgsea_stats_<collection> table of reference distributions.

pathway_url links to the authoritative MSigDB definition of each gene set — so what a score means is one click away from the score itself.

Collections

Pinned to MSigDB 2026.1.Hs and verified by md5, because gene-set membership changes between MSigDB releases and feeds directly into every score.

collection contents file md5
hallmark MSigDB Hallmark — 50 coherent, deliberately non-redundant signatures h.all.v2026.1.Hs.symbols.gmt 367eec875967c2cfbf664a1a065b7b8d
reactome MSigDB C2:CP:REACTOME — 1,839 canonical pathways c2.cp.reactome.v2026.1.Hs.symbols.gmt 1516b5d15611415d1996c92b7cb6d1cc
pid MSigDB C2:CP:PID — 196 NCI-Nature cancer signalling pathways c2.cp.pid.v2026.1.Hs.symbols.gmt 291508046f73d82d13e5efb47492fa47
oncogenic MSigDB C6 — 189 oncogenic signatures (oncogene / tumour-suppressor perturbation) c6.all.v2026.1.Hs.symbols.gmt aba0e2214ff63327ae3fb0ce4bcd11c2
cancer_cell_atlas MSigDB C4:3CA — 148 Curated Cancer Cell Atlas meta-programs (single-cell derived) c4.3ca.v2026.1.Hs.symbols.gmt ff9902288655ff2ab88fcb5cbc4a95dd

MSigDB is released under CC BY 4.0; some constituent collections carry extra restrictions, so we ship only collections we can redistribute scores from. See the MSigDB licence terms.

Method

Barbie et al. (2009) ssGSEA as implemented by Bioconductor GSVA, transcribed to Python and validated against GSVA 2.6.6 to floating-point noise (Pearson/Spearman 1.0000000000, max relative difference 4.8e-13). alpha=0.25, gene sets filtered to a minimum of 10 genes after mapping onto the expression matrix; no maximum size.

Scored on tpm_unstranded over a gene universe of protein-coding genes plus the functional immunoglobulin / T-cell-receptor segments. That last inclusion matters for tumour-immune biology: GENCODE gives Ig/TCR segments their own biotypes, and without them MSigDB's B-cell-receptor and complement pathways match as little as 8% of their genes. Note that V/D/J segments are somatically rearranged, so their expression reports lymphocyte infiltration rather than regulation of a fixed locus.

Because ssGSEA weights ranks rather than expression values, any strictly monotonic transform of the input leaves scores unchanged — there is no reason to log-transform before scoring.

Why score_raw, and how to normalize

score_raw is the only score column, and it is a property of its own sample: it does not depend on which other samples or gene sets were scored alongside it. GSVA's optional normalization divides by the range of the entire score matrix, which would make every value depend on cohort and collection composition — adding Reactome to a Hallmark run widens that divisor by ~49% on this data, silently restating previously published scores.

The ssgsea_stats_* tables carry that composition-dependent information instead. Each project ships its own reference distributions and the pan-cancer ones, so you can normalize without scanning every config:

  • GSVA-equivalent normalization: divide by MAX(max) - MIN(min) over the pan_cancer rows.
  • z-score against a reference population: (score_raw - mean) / sd for the population and sample_type you care about.

Everything in ssgsea_stats_* is derivable from ssgsea_scores_* by aggregation; it is a materialized convenience view, not independent evidence.

Loading

from datasets import load_dataset

# One config per (project, table).
# Config names are <project>_<table> with dashes replaced by underscores.
luad_cases = load_dataset("gabrielaltay/tcga-tabular-open", "TCGA_LUAD_cases")
luad_muts = load_dataset(
    "gabrielaltay/tcga-tabular-open", "TCGA_LUAD_masked_somatic_mutation"
)

GDC references

License & redistribution

Per the NCI GDC Data Analysis Policy:

The GDC itself places no restrictions (other than attempts at reidentification) on analysis or publication of open access data provided through the GDC Data Portal.

Per the NCI TCGA citation page:

Moratoria on all cancer types are now lifted and all TCGA data are available without restrictions on their use in publications or presentations.

Per the GDC Data Access Processes and Tools page:

Open access data generally includes high level genomic data that is not individually identifiable, as well as most clinical and all biospecimen data elements.

Restrictions on use

Users of any data provided by GDC, whether open or controlled access, agree not to attempt to reidentify any individual participant in any study represented by GDC data, for any purpose whatever. (source)

Required acknowledgement

If you publish or present results derived from this dataset, include the NCI-required TCGA acknowledgement:

The results here are in whole or part based upon data generated by the TCGA Research Network: https://www.cancer.gov/tcga.

Suggested citations:

Policy references: GDC Policies, GDC Encyclopedia — Controlled Access (defines what is not in this dataset), NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy.

Disclaimer

This project is not affiliated with the NCI, GDC, or the TCGA Research Network. It is an experimental open-source pipeline that may change significantly between versions. Pipeline source: galtay/tcga2hf.

Downloads last month
151